Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive challengers. In any
campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need
of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume
the role of protector ... the mainstream should be told that gays are
victims of fate, in the sense that most never had a choice to accept
or reject their sexual preference ... Straight viewers must be able to
identify with gays as victims ...
Marshall K. Kirk and Erastes Pill.
Some of the material described in this chapter is extremely offensive in
Our colonialistic, patriarchal society has ruthlessly dominated and
subjugated countless innocent people over the course of hirstory. Gays
and lesbians, minorities, women (especially women of color), Native
Americans, and many others have been oppressed and held down for many
It is about time that the mainstream members of society woke up and
protected these groups, because, although they are strong, they do not
have the sheer numbers they need to achieve full equality in this
"There is no snobbishness like that of professional
Various Neoliberal special interest groups have learned that the most
certain way to achieve social progress is to get people to sympathize
with them. The easiest and most direct way to do this is to assume a
permanent victim status, and thereby demand special treatment under the
guise of "civil rights."
This strategy is patterned after the original civil rights movement.
However, whereas the civil rights movement had as its goal the full
equality of Black people, our society has devolved to the point where
any group with an anti-life agenda can succeed in achieving its goals
merely by wrapping itself in the cloak of "civil rights."
The civil rights movement included a large class of genuine
victims, but its individual members did not dwell on this fact; the
anti-life movements are different in that they are by no stretch of the
imagination actual victims, but they recognize the great value in
being perceived as such.
Therefore, the Neoliberal movements manufacture and compile daunting
lists of imaginary transgressions committed against their special
interest groups, exaggerate actual offenses to act as centerpieces in
their propaganda campaigns, and rewrite history to reflect or magnify
this imaginary "victimhood."
The Message of Despair.
An Infested Society.
The central message of this bogus and self-defeating philosophy is
that American society is unjustly oppressing a large number of certified
"victim groups." The anti-life strategists insist that our
society is infested with;
classism ("oppression of the working classes");
able-ism ("oppression of the handicapped");
look-ism (described by the Smith College Office of Student Affairs
"construction of a standard for
Eurocentrism (a "preoccupation with Western culture");
heterosexism ("oppression of homosexuals");
and an impressive swarm of other "isms."
The Progression to True Disability.
The great danger of this defeatist mindset is as obvious as it is
inevitable. Quite simply, perception becomes reality if one is
brainwashed for long enough.
If people actually come to believe that they are victims, and if
their leaders tell them that there is absolutely nothing they can do to
better their lot in life because the entire system is corrupt,
eventually the group becomes permanently "victimized."
They are born as victims, live as victims, die as victims, and cannot
achieve anything meaningful on a personal or societal scale because they
are convinced that they cannot possibly succeed.
This victimist propaganda tells Blacks who are gullible enough to
listen that United States society is an inherently racist system
in which they cannot possibly succeed, no matter how hard they try. Any
Blacks who do succeed (such as four-star generals, Congressmen,
or conservative Supreme Court justices like Clarence Thomas) are
denounced by many Black leaders as "Uncle Toms" or
"Oreos" (Black outside and White inside).
During the Thomas confirmation battle, Virginia Governor L. Douglas
Wilder displayed his anti-Catholic bigotry and his blatant ignorance
when he asked "The question is, how much allegiance is there to the
Pope?," despite the fact that Thomas is Episcopalian. Movie
producer and inveterate whiner Spike Lee labeled Thomas "a
handkerchief-head, chicken-and-biscuit eating Uncle Tom." And
the ever-present and ever-obnoxious Neoleftist syndicated columnist Carl
Rowan wrote that "If you gave Clarence Thomas a little flour on his
face, you'd think you had David Duke talking."
These self-starters are painted as traitors to their race and are
ridiculed as the White man's ignorant tools. The victimist propaganda
also warns young Blacks that, even if they do succeed on
society's terms against all odds, they will be disenfranchised and
shunned by their own people. By becoming middle or upper class, they
will somehow have abandoned their less fortunate brethren and are
somehow guilty for their lack of success.
The real reason the 'Black rejectionists' condemn successful Black
conservatives is that these talented men and women do not need
the victim status or those who push it. Successful Black people put the
lie to those who would disable an entire race.
Of course, extreme left-wing radicals say that the only way to remedy
this situation is to overthrow the entire system. This is why the
Revolutionary Communist Party of the USA (RCP) supports pornography,
homosexuality, abortion, and the "right to die" as
self-serving philosophies that weaken the fabric of our society.
For further information on the techniques of subversion used by
Communist organizations, see Chapter 95 of Volume III, "Lenin's
Rules for Revolution." For more information on the strategy of
infiltration and subversion, see Chapter 10.
Case Study: People Becoming Victims.
It is very interesting to compare the progress made by a group of
people who are genuinely handicapped and coddled by the system as
compared to an identical group that are fully integrated into society
and are expected to behave like everyone else.
In a certain small community on Massachusetts State's Martha's
Vineyard, about ten percent of the population was born deaf. Historian
Nora Groce found that 80 percent of both nonhearers and hearers
graduated from high school; 90 percent of the nonhearers and 92 percent
of the hearers got married; and both groups of people had about the same
number of children, income levels, and distribution of occupations.
Then Groce compared this situation with the Massachusetts mainland,
considered to have the best services for the deaf in the entire country.
Statewide, only 50 percent of nonhearers graduated from high school as
compared to 75 percent of hearers; nonhearers married 50 percent of the
time, compared to 90 percent for hearers; only 40 percent of nonhearers
had children, while 80 percent of the hearers did; and non-hearers were
clustered at the bottom of the occupation scale, making, on the average,
only one-third the salaries that hearers did.
She summarized her findings thusly: On an island with no services for
the nonhearing, the deaf lived on an equal footing with the hearing,
while just thirty miles away, the nonhearing lived much poorer lives
than the hearing, despite the availability of the most advanced services
in the world.
In other words, as the author noted, "The one place in the
United States where deafness was not a disability was a place with no
services for deaf people."
The New Social "Pecking Orders."
This aggressive pursuit of the exalted 'victim status' has led to the
evolution of a set of bizarre, dominant Neoliberal social hierarchies
that are exact inversions of the original unjust century-old social
hierarchies they now condemn as "racist," "sexist,"
"intolerant," and "homophobic."
Neoliberals, however, fail to see that this set of new hierarchies is
just as unfair and racist as the old set, and that it inevitably leads
to the same abuses and double standards that the 'old' hierarchies did.
These "pecking orders" are based exclusively upon society's
perceived degree of each group's historical victimization. In other
words, the degree to which a group can "bend the rules" is
directly proportional to the degree to which it claims that it has been
victimized in the past.
Figure 9-1 depicts, in outline form, the four Neoliberal social
THE MAJOR NEOLIBERAL SOCIAL HIERARCHIES
I. ORGANIC OR "UNCHANGEABLE" IDENTITIES *
A. Racial Identity
1. Highest ranking: Blacks
2. Intermediate ranking: Hispanics and
3. Lowest ranking: Whites and Asians
B. Sexual Identity
1. Highest ranking: Homosexual men
2. Intermediate ranking: Lesbians and
3. Lowest ranking: Heterosexuals
II. ASSUMED OR "CHANGEABLE" IDENTITIES
C. Religious Identity
1. Highest ranking: Atheists, pagans,
2. High intermediate ranking: Liberal
3. Low intermediate ranking: Liberal
4. Lowest ranking: Orthodox Catholics
and Jews and Fundamentalists
D. Political Identity
1. Highest ranking: Neoliberals
2. Intermediate ranking: Liberals,
"centrists," and "moderates"
3. Lowest ranking: Conservative
NOTE: Experts in human sexuality generally agree that 'sexual
orientation' is not inborn or genetic, but instead is a matter of
election or personal preference. See Chapter 116 in Volume III,
"Homosexual Orientation," for more information on this topic.
Who Can Attack Whom?
These hierarchies essentially dictate who can attack whom with
impunity. In other words, we have evolved "pecking orders"
where the weak "victims" (who actually wield the power) can
attack the strong "oppressors" (who actually have little
voice) with impunity. It all depends on the relative perceived degree of
victimization of the attacker and the 'attackee.'
The following paragraphs discuss the implications of the four major
Neoliberal social "pecking orders;"
The Implications of Racial Identity.
If black people kill black people every day, why not have a week
and kill white people? ... If your white great-great-grandfather
killed my great-great-grandfather, and your white great-grandfather
sold my great-grandfather, and your white grandfather raped my
grandmother, and your father stole, cheated, lied, and robbed my
father, what kind of fool would I have to be to say 'Come, my friend'
to the white daughter and son?
"Sister Souljah" (Lisa Williamson)
A Typical Bogus "Victim:" Tawana Brawley.
Tawana Brawley is a classic product of the victim mentality. In
mid-1988, this teenaged Black girl claimed that she was raped by a
vicious gang of White punks.
According to the strange logic of the victim mentality, she therefore
had "standing" to insist that the entire American justice
system was racist because it refused to bring her assailants to justice.
Of course, the real reason the "system" "refused"
to bring her assailants to justice was because the attackers simply did
not exist. It turned out that Brawley was lying, and the alleged rape
However, this minor detail was irrelevant, because truth itself
is irrelevant to the victim mentality. Brawley, the Rev. Al Sharpton,
and their entourage of "groupies" continue to lie about the
mythical incident, speaking indignantly at rallies and fundraisers and
collecting wild applause and lots of cash.
The truth no longer matters to these "Black rejectionists."
All that matters is the victim status, which is treasured above all.
Brawley, Sharpton, and others know that if a person can be certified as
a member of a "victim class," the world is his oyster.
Other groups have learned from these phony "civil rights"
leaders. Pro-abortionists, pornographers, and homosexuals have succeeded
in achieving goals beyond their wildest dreams by creating and then
using their victim status as a club to advance their agendas.
Euthanasiasts also use this strategy to paint the pitiful picture of
suffering human "vegetables" trapped in an artificial Hell
created by medical technology run amuck.
Even prostitutes are trying to certify themselves as a class of
victims, although they have not (yet) enjoyed marked success. The whores
have organized into unions which tend to be named after animals: Cast
Off Your Old Tired Ethics (COYOTE); Johns and Call Girls United Against
Repression (JACGUAR); and Hooking is Respectable Employment (HIRE).
Perhaps most incredibly, the organized child molesters like the North
American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) are trying to cast themselves
in the roles of victims. Much of this perverted group's time is spent
complaining about the "excessive" jail terms given to their
members who have been caught having sex with children.
Under the 'old' racial hierarchy, a Black man who raped a White woman
was either lynched or hung. Under the 'new' hierarchy, a gang of Black
men can go 'wilding' in Central Park, beat a White woman almost to death
with bricks and pipes, rape her repeatedly and then be defended by
leading Black politicians.
When White cops beat up a Black man (Rodney King) and it is caught on
videotape, the community (and the nation, for that matter) rises up in
outrage. But, during the April 29-May 2, 1992 Los Angeles riots that
killed 51 people, news cameras caught four young Black men dragging
Reginald O. Denny from his truck and then beating him almost to death
with bricks and iron bars. At least one of them was a member of the
violent 8-Trey Gangster Crips street gang. When these four punks were
charged, many people threatened another riot. Many Communists and Black
leaders accused "the system" of the usual charge racism and
pledged to stand by their new heroes, the "L.A. Four."
White Howard Beach teenagers who beat up a Black man are labeled
'racist,' and such an incident induces an orgy of national
self-criticism. If a gang of Black youths beat up a White, somehow the
action is justified and the attackers are coddled and excused because
they are "oppressed" or "underprivileged."
It is very significant that the "victim status" is not
automatically conferred upon all racial minorities.
After the United States absorbed more than three million Asian
refugees and immigrants in the 1970s and early 1980s, the nation has
observed a display of industriousness unparalleled in its history. Asian
immigrants as a class worked diligently, succeeded tremendously, and
were utterly ignored by the champions of minority rights.
Because the Asian immigrants didn't need Jesse Jackson,
Benjamin Hooks, Al Sharpton, and all of the other pity-peddlers. The
Asians took the real road to success and showed conclusively that the
'victim status' is merely an attempt to ascend in society on a raft of
feelings instead of on real work.
Contortions for American Indians.
A few American Indians have bought into the Neoliberal nonsense that
is so radically different from their heritage. By doing so, they have
traded strength for weakness. They have added their pitiable bleating to
the chorus of simpering "victims," thereby greatly dishonoring
themselves by loudly demanding special treatment that, in many cases,
borders on the ridiculous.
In all fairness, much of the noise on their behalf is generated by
Neoliberals who seem to have nothing better to do with their time.
For example, the United States Department of the Interior has
recently drawn up rules enforcing the Indian Arts and Crafts Act of
1990, whereby anyone who sells Indian art not made by real Indians is
guilty of a Federal crime punishable by five years in prison and a
quarter-million dollar fine. The Wall Street Journal observed
that "Mind you, authentic Indian art means art by authentic
Indians, not art that authentically draws on Indian heritage. A cubist
nude reclining in the Bois de Boulogne painted by a Navajo counts as
Indian art; an impeccably Navajo blanket woven by a Frenchman
The mass media, of course, is breathlessly ready to not only report
on, but to participate in, such acts of useless stupidity.
In their mad rush to avoid offense to anyone but White males and
Christians, some of these media outlets and government agencies commit
just plain dumb policies and then doggedly defend them in the face of
The Oregonian [Portland, Oregon] and several other major-city
newspapers have sports sections that do not use the team names
"Indians," "Braves," "Chiefs," or
"Redskins," considering them to be derogatory and
discriminatory. Instead, for example, the papers clumsily refer to
"The professional baseball team from Atlanta" in their
The silliness does not end there. Cristobal Colon was selected to be
Grand Marshal of the 103rd Tournament of Roses Parade in Pasadena,
California on January 1, 1992. American Indians objected strenuously,
because Colon happens to be the
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandson of that alleged colonialist and purveyor of genocide,
It did not matter to the Neoliberals that many of their own people
were probably numbered among the tens of thousands of Columbus'
descendants; all that mattered to them was making a show of force.
And these, remember, are the people who preach nonjudgmentalism and
the policy of 'forgive and forget.'
And, of course, the politicos have gotten into the act with their
neverending pandering for favor. Perhaps the most extreme example of
silliness was provided by ultraliberal Washington State governor Mike
Lowry who, after his January 1993 swearing-in ceremony, refused to refer
to his Chief of Staff as such, because American Indians might be
offended. Instead, proclaimed Lowry, this person would be officially
referred to as his "Staff Director."
You Teach the Right Thing, Baby!
As described in Chapter 114 of Volume III, "Homeschooling,"
the Neoliberals have admitted many times that their agendas cannot
advance unless they have complete control of the public school system.
Therefore, any criticism of Neoliberal thought and especially of
Neoliberal heroes that is offered in our schools must be vigilantly and
Karen J. Collins, a music teacher in a Washington, DC high school,
found this out the hard way. She was displeased at being compelled to
help celebrate Martin Luther King day because she had read some very
uncomplimentary things about him.
Some students overheard her telling a fellow teacher (who happened to
be Black) her opinion of King, and these students squealed on her.
Collins was immediately fired from her job as a teacher and was forced
to attend the school system's "re-education course in
human-relations sensitivity" before she was allowed to be
transferred to some other job that presented no opportunity for her to
communicate her allegedly "radical and dangerous views" to her
The Impact of Music.
Music is another arena in which the Neoliberal racial hierarchy
operates quite efficiently. Music makes us feel romantic; it inspires
patriotic fervor in us; it makes us feel happy or sad; and yet, some
Neoliberals stupidly insist that it cannot compel unbalanced teenagers
to think seriously about committing suicide or rape!
Try these excerpts from 2 Live Crew's 1990 album, "As Nasty As
They Wanna Be;"
To have her walkin' funny we try to abuse it,
. . .
it makes you puke ...
The album included the words "b_tch" and "f_ck"
more than 200 times. Yet this sloppy, badly-played dirt was stridently
defended by Neoliberals as "representative of Black
culture." The New York Times editorialized that
"The history of music is the story of innovative, even outrageous
styles that interacted, adapted, and became mainstream."
How true! When a gang of Black teenagers went "wilding" in
Central Park in April 1989, they raped a jogger and beat her with clubs
and bricks for the pure joy of it. Said one defendant, "It was
something to do. It was fun."
The same people who complain about this kind of violence applaud and
defend 2 Live Crew's 'rap music' as "provocative,"
"outrageous," and "explicit." Many of the group's
anarchistic fellow 'artists' who had not even thought about the issue
bleated their obligatory knee-jerk 'victimhood' slogans. Sinead
O'Connor, for example, grumbled that "I have immense admiration for
2 Live Crew. I think that what they've been subjected to is disgraceful,
And then the Neoliberals scratch their collective head and wonder why
Compare 2 Live Crew's lyrics to Andrew Dice Clay's semi-famous
nursery-rhyme routine, spouted at almost all of his
. . .
This obscene garbage is virtually identical in its content to the
lyrics of 2 Live Crew shown above. Yet 2 Live Crew is defended and the
"Diceman" is condemned. He has been declared persona non
grata by several television shows and numerous media stars. Entire
city councils have unanimously condemned him and urged ticketholders to
turn in their tickets at their own expense. Yet these same city councils
welcome 2 Live Crew. Why the difference in treatment?
The difference, of course, is that Andrew Dice Clay is White, and
therefore not a member of a certified victim group.
"Slimy Jews" and Neoliberals.
Persons who possess a high rank in one social hierarchy can usually
attack people of high standing in a different social hierarchy with a
relative degree of impunity.
Leroi Jones (now Amiri Baraka) wrote in 1967 that;
We want poems like fists beating niggers out of Jocks of dagger
poems in the slimy bellies of the owner-Jews; Look at the Liberal
Spokesman for the Jews Clutch his throat and puke himself into
eternity; Another bad poem cracking steel knuckles in a Jewlady's
If a White conservative had written such gibberish, he or she would
be permanently banned from public discourse on any subject whatsoever.
So what was Jones (Baraka)'s punishment? He is now a full professor
and Chairman of Afro-American Studies at the StonyBrook Campus of the
prestigious State University of New York.
Jones (Baraka) is by no means the only Black Jew-baiter around.
Prominent Black personality Steve Cokely made the atrocious allegation
that "The AIDS epidemic is a result of doctors, especially Jewish
ones, who inject AIDS into Blacks." He was backed up by Louis
Farrakhan, who defended this statement by saying that Jews didn't like
it because "the truth hurts."
In another incident, City University of New York (CUNY) professor
Leonard Jeffries said in an Albany speech that
There was a conspiracy planned and plotted and programmed out of
Hollywood, with people named Greenberg and Weisberg and Triglani and
whatnot. Russian Jewry had control over the movies, and their
financial partners, the Mafia, put together a system of destruction
for the Black people.
Yakub's "White Devils." Susan Sontag has written that
"The white race is the cancer of history." And Black Muslim
Elijah Muhammad revealed with a flourish and trumpets that Whites are
devils invented by a mad scientist named Yakub.
Anyone (i.e., American Nazis) who utters such silliness directed
against Blacks is instantly attacked by the formidable media machine and
the full weight of the court system.
Hooks Steps On It.
After Bernard Goetz had gunned down four Black thugs who had
threatened him on a New York subway, Benjamin Hooks of the National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) complained
that "[New York] is the place where a white man riding on a subway
became a folk hero after he gunned down four young Black men because he
did not like the way they looked and acted."
Hooks conveniently chose to omit a few minor but very pertinent
details that Black jurors voted with White jurors to acquit Goetz; that
all four of the youths that accosted him had criminal records, and that
three of them were carrying sharpened screwdrivers, the weapon of choice
for punks who want to avoid stiffer penalties associated with carrying
handguns; that three of the four would subsequently commit serious
crimes within a year of the Goetz incident; and that several polls
showed that the majority of New York Blacks supported Goetz, not
In 1979, the same Benjamin Hooks had teamed up with Julian Bond and
Joseph Lowery, head of Martin Luther King's Southern Christian
Leadership Conference, to head a delegation to Libya. While Muammar
Gaddhafi's propaganda cameras ground away, they bestowed upon the
mega-terrorist an award of appreciation that they claimed was from all
American Blacks grandly entitled "The Decoration of Martin Luther
Coddling Through "Race Norming."
The implications of racial identity may seem theoretical, but they
have concrete meaning for thousands of people. Those seeking Federal and
state jobs have frequently been turned down in favor of less-qualified
applicants, and may want to know why this is so.
"Race norming" is one way that governments are trying to
make up for their past "transgressions" against certified
victim groups. Under this system, applicants are measured against other
members of their own racial group, not against applicants as a whole.
Therefore, a White or Asian-American person who achieves a raw score of
300 on a particular test would rank in the 47th percentile, and a Black
or Hispanic who scores the identical 300 would be ranked in the 87th
In other words, this hiring system (and many others) reward
mediocrity, cause demotivation in self-starters, and contribute to
overall inefficiency in the government. The color of one's skin has
become much more important than qualifications or competence.
Isn't this the kind of abuse that "equal opportunity" was
supposed to eradicate?
On Interracial Crimes.
One myth that is relentlessly milked by Neoliberals is that of a
"tide of White-on-Black, racially-motivated crime." The
impression that is being striven for here, of course, is that there are
tens of thousands of Whites 'out there' whose latent racism frequently
explodes into violent crime against Blacks. Simple robbery and assault,
claim the Neolibs, are a varieties of true "hate crimes" if
Whites commit them against Blacks. Black-on-White crime, of course, is
just "disadvantaged minorities taking out their frustrations
against an inherently racist system."
William Wilbanks, Florida International University Professor of
Criminal Justice and author of the book The Myth of a Racist Criminal
Justice System, exploded this fairy tale when he found that
There is interracial violence in America. In 1985, 629,000
interracial crimes where reported (where victims survived to identify
the criminal); but nine out of ten were committed by Blacks against
Whites. Where White criminals, 98 percent of the time, prey on other
Whites to rape, rob, and assault Black criminals chose fellow Blacks as
victims less than half the time. Black criminals seem to prefer
attacking White people. While only 2 percent of the victims chosen by
White criminals are Black, more than 50 percent of the victims
targeted by Black criminals to rape, rob and assault are White.
An analysis of these statistics reveals some fascinating comparisons.
The United States population is currently 13 percent Black and 75
percent White. If 90 percent of all interracial crime is committed by
Blacks against Whites, this means that Blacks are
(0.90/(0.13)/(0.10/0.75) = 52 times more likely to attack Whites than
The reason this statistic is never heard is that anyone who dares to
mention it will instantly earn the brands "racist" and
"bigot." This is why the impression given by the news media is
that most "racially-motivated" crimes are of Whites against
Blacks, and, indeed, all of the major racially-biased crimes reported on
by the media and commented on by "civil rights leaders" are
The Implications of Sexual Identity.
Homosexuals can ruthlessly stereotype and ridicule 'straights,' and
it is considered justifiable because, after all, heterosexuals are
guilty of "AIDS genocide." But let a straight comedian like
the Diceman make fun of homosexuals, and MTV bans him for life.
Under this system, when a "straight" calls a homosexual a
"queer" or "faggot," he is prosecuted because he has
committed a Federally-classified "hate crime." However, when
homosexuals attack St. Patrick's Cathedral, assault its parishioners,
and desecrate the consecrated Host, they are, according to local
politicians, merely "expressing justifiable outrage." And they
are sentenced to a few hours of community service (that they naturally
never perform) by a "judge" who compares them to Mahatma
Gandhi and Martin Luther King.
Advantage to the Sodomites.
Homosexual activists recognize the great power of their victim
status. No longer is the battle cry "AIDS is our strength!" a
mystery to normal people. As homosexual activists Marshall K. Kirk and
Erastes Pill have said,
Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive challengers. In any
campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need
of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume
the role of protector ... jaunty mustachioed musclemen would keep a
very low profile in gay commercials and other public presentations,
while sympathetic figures of nice young people, old people, and
attractive women would be featured (it goes without saying that groups
on the farthest margin of acceptability, such as NAMBLA [the North
American Man-Boy Love Association], must play no part at all in such a
Suspected child-molesters will never look like victims.
Now, there are two different messages about the Gay Victim that are
worth communicating. First, the mainstream should be told that gays
are victims of fate, in the sense that most never had a choice to
accept or reject their sexual preference. The message must read:
"As far as gays can tell, they were born gay, just as you were
born heterosexual or white or black or bright or athletic ... they are
not morally blameworthy.
"Straight viewers must be able to identify with gays as
victims ... To this end, the persons featured in the public campaign
should be decent and upright, appealing and admirable by straight
standards ... spokesmen for our cause must be R-type "straight
gays" rather than Q-type "homosexuals on display"
Notice the extraordinary similarity to the tactics used by the
Neofeminist movement. Neatly tailored women attorneys are the storm
troopers who have made all the pro-abortion gains in court. The
Neofeminists complain that they are the victims of "misogyny,"
and that any person who opposes their agenda simply hates all women.
Under the 'old' sexual hierarchy, homosexual members of Congress
remained rigidly 'closeted,' because the mere suspicion of sexual
perversion led to censure and probable loss of office. Under the 'new'
hierarchy, Congressman Gerry Studds can run a homosexual prostitution
ring out of his home, and the Ethics Committee and his constituency both
look the other way.
Imagine what would happen if Senator Jesse Helms merely visited
a whorehouse; he would be thrown out of office the same day!
A Phony "Threefer:" Azalea Cooley.
In the Fall of 1992, Oregonians witnessed perhaps the most vicious
political campaign ever waged in this country. The Oregon Citizens
Alliance, a conservative group opposing special rights for homosexuals,
placed a ballot measure before the people which would declare
homosexuality "abnormal and perverse."
The reaction to this ballot measure was wholly predictable: Almost
every political, religious, fraternal, and business organization in the
State of Oregon condemned the measure as "hateful,"
"bigoted," "ignorant," "mean-spirited,"
and every other nasty adjective in the book. Vandalism, death threats,
and slander were typical tactics used by those opposing the ballot
One of the most powerful tools used by the homophiles was the
allegation that "hate crimes" were on the increase as a direct
result of Ballot Measure 9. The "No On Hate" Campaign
claimed that the ballot measure had led to a 23% increase in hate crimes
in the single year between 1991 and 1992.
The most powerful spokesperson for the "No on Hate"
Campaign emerged in the person of crippled Black lesbian Azalea Cooley,
a "triple victim" in the eyes of the sodomites. Cooley made
dozens of speeches before large crowds, displaying prominently a foam
board listing all of the more than twenty "hate crimes" that
had been directed towards her, including death threats, cross burnings,
vandalism, and the like.
The day before the 1992 elections, a police surveillance team filmed
Cooley stepping past her wheelchair, walking into her front yard, and
setting up a cross for burning. Less than two weeks later, Cooley not
only admitted to staging all of the hate crimes herself, but confessed
that she was not really crippled after all. Her wheelchair was just a
prop. She had shaved her head to make it look like her hair had all
fallen out as a result of chemotherapy for alleged brain cancer. The
seizures that conveniently gripped her whenever someone asked her
questions that she did not like were faked.
She then clumsily (and ineffectively) attempted suicide in order to
try to get even more sympathy and claimed that she was "just sick
and looking for attention." Finally (apparently secure in the
belief that Oregonians have IQs two points above broccoli) she strongly
asserted that her activities had no political purpose whatsoever!
Cooley had conveniently forgotten that she had blamed the more than 20
ersatz "hate crimes" directed at her on a "growing air of
intolerance fueled partly by Measure 9."
Even after these revelations, the homosexuals did not disavow
Cooley's activities they expressed sympathy towards her instead and
staged the usual outpouring of phony emotion so that they would look
good to the public. Predictably, there was absolutely no condemnation
from the press.
If an Oregon Citizens Alliance member had staged such hate crimes,
not only wouldn't the press have cared, they would have probably called
for a jail term if he had been caught in the process.
For anti-lifers, the treasured
victim status is much more than a ceremonial title. It is a formidable
weapon that allows "victims" to use brute force in order to
accomplish objectives by simply sidestepping the usual social
"rules of play." In other words, "victims" see life
as TEGWAR The Exciting Game Without Any Rules. And those people who are
unfortunate enough to get in the way are simply crushed.
Radio personality Andy Rooney found out firsthand that the rights of
free speech and association have been discarded in favor of politically
correct (P.C.) views.
In 1990, Rooney had the audacity to suggest that homosex and
cigarette smoking might be unhealthy. After outraged sodomites attacked
him on every available public front, The Wall Street Journal
noted its disapproval of this new brand of McCarthyism as it
editorialized that "Certain offenses, those of racism and
homophobia in particular, now have such status that it is necessary only
to be accused of them to be found guilty or at least irremediably
tainted ... Today, the universities and the academies are the main
perpetrators of thought control and repression places where even small
deviations from the established orthodoxies on women, homosexuality or
race bring instant retribution and threats to job security."
Naturally, if a Neoliberal favorite makes a truly racist statement,
he is excused by his peers for having suffered "just an
uncharacteristic slip of the tongue" or "a momentary lapse in
judgment." In 1982, CBS correspondent Mike Wallace, who has
relentlessly ridiculed conservative beliefs, commented on the difficulty
Blacks and Hispanics had in understanding complex sales contracts.
Wallace said that "You bet your _ss they [the contracts] are hard
to read ... if you're reading them over watermelon and tacos."
Not a murmur was heard from Neoliberal groups or from Wallace's
fellow journalists after this grossly racist statement. Contrast this to
the treatment that Rooney received, and the Neoliberal double-standard
is highlighted once again.
Religious Beliefs Mean Nothing.
In a classic confrontation between an official "oppressor"
and an official "victim class," Georgetown University, a
Catholic college, was forced by the District of Columbia Court of
Appeals to grant privileges to a homosexual campus organization. Nan
Hunter of the Lesbian and Gay Rights Project of the American Civil
Liberties Union hailed the ruling as "a milestone."
What this ruling means is that a special interest group may bring the
power of the State to bear on a private, non-Federally funded religious
college to accept a group whose very purpose is to advocate practices
that are anathema to the religion of the college itself.
Movin' Out at the University of Wisconsin.
Ann Hacklander, Maureen Reed, and Cari Sprague were roommates at a
Madison, Wisconsin apartment. When Sprague informed her roommates that
she was homosexual, they gently asked her to leave. They did not throw
her out; they did not threaten her; they merely asked her if she would
mind finding somewhere else to live.
In retaliation for this "offense," Sprague immediately
filed a grievance with the local Equal Opportunity Commission, which
hauled Reed and Hacklander in and grilled them for two hours, reducing
them to tears. Reed and Hacklander were threatened with legal action and
were finally pressured into accepting a four-year agreement that forced
them to; (1) pay Sprague $1,500 in unspecified "damages;" (2)
write her an "acceptable" (i.e., suitably groveling) letter of
apology; (3) attend "sensitivity training sessions" conducted
by homosexuals, and (4) have the Commission monitor their housing
arrangements for two years (presumably to force them to be exposed to
other homosexual roommates).
To put this in perspective, imagine what would have happened if two
homosexual roommates had asked a "straight" to leave.
The answer, of course, is "absolutely nothing."
Eradicating 'Homophobia' the Neoliberal Way.
The University of Wisconsin is certainly not alone in its
supersensitivity to alleged offenses against homosexuals. More than 70
percent of this country's colleges and universities now possess codes of
conduct that ban behavior and speech based upon racism, sexism, and,
many times, "homophobia."
The danger that these codes represent to the free discussion of ideas
far outweighs their usefulness. This has already been demonstrated,
because several colleges have severely punished students for merely
wanting to debate the topic of homosexuality.
A student at the University of Michigan expressed his opinion that
homosexuality was a disease and announced his intention to establish a
counseling program to help homosexuals leave that lifestyle. He was
dragged before a panel of university administrators, unanimously found
guilty of "sexual harassment," and was dismissed from the
And a Yale student met the same fate after he merely posted a notice
of a debate about whether or not the CIA's policy of discriminating
against homosexuals was legitimate.
Political science professor Jean Betheke Elshtain, while highlighting
the dangers presented by codes against racism, also points out the
difficulties associated with all punitive codes of this nature;
"My hunch is that, over the long haul, the upshot of such endeavors
[college speech codes] will not be a purified, racist-free, collective
student consciousness, but a simmering backlog of resentment at being
labeled as a racist, even if one has never committed a racist act or
uttered a racist slur."
As the American Civil Liberties Union commonly asserts, if unpopular
ideas are banned today, the more popular ones will inevitably be banned
in the future.
You Ain't Gonna Believe This One ...
Since homosexuals possess not the slightest vestige of self-control,
they automatically push the limits of their "victim status" to
the extreme with antics that would be hilariously funny if they were not
so incredibly pitiable.
Even transvestites ("cross-dressers" in PC parlance), are
going mainstream, riding the 'dresstails' of other homosexuals who have
"got it made."
What must normal people think when hundreds of TVs descend upon their
towns for major conventions such as the one held by "BE ALL"
at the Pittsburgh Hotel Sheraton from June 6 to June 10, 1990, and by
The Tiffany Club of New England at the exclusive Boatslip Beach Club of
Provincetown, Massachusetts, from May 29 to June 4, 1990? These
gatherings attract hundreds of TVs and feature workshops, manicurists,
hairdressers, makeup artists, and clothiers specializing in making
women's clothes that fit men's bodies. There are also "Big
Sister" programs where experienced TVs help out new ones.
'Mainstream' sodomite publications often discuss the unique
difficulties experienced by transvestites, such as covering over
five-o'clock shadow and (this is not a joke, although it should
be) how the members of a transvestite water-skiing club can keep their
wigs on and prevent them from sinking to the bottom of the river if they
do come off!
What Happens When They Get Their Way.
What happens when "gay rights" laws pass? What happens when
sodomites have free rein?
A few examples are described below.
Local 706, Hair and Stylist Union, of North Hollywood,
California, has a confirmed official policy of not admitting anyone to
the union unless they are practicing homosexuals. Of course, no
normal person would want to be part of a group of perverted
hair teasers, but if they did take leave of their senses and apply,
they would be rejected because they were not sex perverts.
Attorneys confirmed that there would be no penalty for such reverse
Anglican Bishop Alexander Muge was barred from preaching in a
church in his own denomination in Walnut Creek, California, because he
dared to mention a passage from Leviticus and had the audacity to
preach against sodomy.
The Minneapolis Civil Rights Commission fined the Catholic
Archdiocese of Minneapolis-St. Paul $35,000 for violating a municipal
"gay rights" ordinance when it expelled the pro-sodomy group
Dignity from its Campus Ministry Newman Center. $20,000 of this money
went directly to Dignity and $15,000 to the city, a tidy little
arrangement with not a little conflict of interest.
The Escalated "War of the Sexes."
Naturally, one of the most basic "victim classes" is
actually a slight majority females. And many of these women join
exceptionally obnoxious organizations whose sole purpose seems to be
demanding special treatment.
Chapter 129 of Volume III, "Neofeminism," describes some of
the tactics that these far-left Feminazis use in their attempts to
replace one 'sexist' system with one that is just as sexist. In their
constant push to overthrow the "patriarchy," these women have
redefined the word "shrill."
Keith Stimely, a frequently-obscene speaker who revels in lambasting
both Neoliberal and conservative activists, paints a comical, vivid and
accurate picture of the fevered and 'victimized' Neofeminist world;
You've seen the section in bookstores Women's Studies, a jumble of
man-hating novels and essays; lesbian propaganda disguised as clinical
research into straight sex lives; the hairy-legged tracts of the
so-called "white witches;" coy celebrations of menstruation
and other uterine mysteries; spurious archeology fabricating a golden,
peaceful age of matriarchy; and, most alarmingly, violent screeds
screaming for male gendercide. Very few males blunder into this
"pedagogy of the oppressed." Fewer still actually ingest the
suffocatingly righteous blithering.
Not that they're invited to. Women's Studies are the studies of
women by women for women, a gender-exclusive club appropriating the
wardrobe of third world-style rhetoric. This is the language of the
victim, a screeching vocabulary of complaint and revolt against the
despotic tyranny of men. Males, being despots, are not welcome to
enter into dialogue with the Women's Studies club unless they check
their testosterone at the door, guiltily accept the "bad
guy" onus, and cluck their tongues against the miscreants of
their own gender who stubbornly deny female superiority. These
dejuiced males can be viewed to best advantage in college towns, their
concave chests cuddling the bastard offspring of Birkenstock-clad
mates who are busy passing out petitions for the removal of Penthouse
from convenience stores ...
The Implications of Religious Identity.
The Overall Imbalance.
The "victim status" as it now exists allows Neoliberals to
attack or assault conservative Catholic, fundamentalist, and Jewish
churches with impunity. However, counterattacks or even vigorous defense
against such tactics are labeled "intolerant" and a
"violation of the separation of church and state."
Therefore, anti-theists can aggressively attack Christians and
Christianity through the media and the arts (i.e., the Sisters of
Perpetual Indulgence and a crucifix submerged in urine) under the guise
of free speech. However, if Christians react and counterattack by
attempting to defund the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), their
actions are immediately condemned by the Neoliberal media.
Homosexuals and pro-abortionists, who have learned to manipulate the
victim status and the media expertly, can literally get away with any
kind of physical attack or slander against Catholics and fundamentalists
in particular. Brief descriptions of a few examples of this unjust
Attack On a Cathedral.
Homosexuals and pro-abortionists belonging to the groups ACT-UP (AIDS
Coalition to Unleash Power) and WHAM (Women's Health Action
Mobilization) stormed New York's St. Patrick's Cathedral on December 10,
1989, assaulted parishioners, screamed curses, and desecrated the
consecrated Host by throwing It on the ground and stamping on It.
Outside, hundreds of screaming sodomites burned Cardinal O'Connor in
effigy and attacked passersby, all because the Cardinal had refused to
toe their immoral "safe sex" line.
After the invasion of St. Patrick's cathedral, ACT-UP issued a press
statement saying that its cause was "important enough [to allow us]
to invade any space, to disrupt any speech."
The organizers of the sacrilege the self-proclaimed "Safe Sex
Six" were sentenced by Manhattan Criminal Court Judge Jo Ann
Ferdinand to from 75 to 100 hours of community service. She refused to
imprison or fine them, saying that she "admired their
commitment," and compared them to Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther
King, a comparison that Ray Kerrison of the New York Post found
"... so utterly bizarre that is besmirches the memory of two
genuine historic figures."
In December of 1990, in defiance of a court order resulting from the
attack one year earlier, sodomites broke into the Mass once again and
made off with consecrated Hosts, which they gleefully displayed and
In 1989 and 1990, homosexuals waged a continuing war of vandalism and
outright destruction against Catholic churches in Los Angeles. Sodomite
attackers calling themselves "Greater Religious
Responsibility" claimed responsibility for vicious attacks against
Archbishop Roger Mahony, calling him a "murderer" for opposing
their "safe sex" programs and for labeling the use of condoms
They attacked the Cathedral of St. Mary of the Assumption in Los
Angeles, desecrating it with bloody-red hand prints and pornographic
photographs of perverted sex acts plastered on the windows.
Additionally, ACT-UP posters were pasted everywhere.
At St. Catherine's, they nailed a ten-foot cross festooned with
plastic penises and used condoms to the church door. They smeared the
chancery with animal blood and entrails that appeared to be the products
of Satanic sacrifices.
At the traditional Christmas Day 1990 Mass at St. Mary's in
Washington, D.C., ACT-UP and other sodomite groups invaded the church,
destroyed candle stands, assaulted parishioners, and noisily shouted and
waved obscene placards.
One of the favorite tactics of these violent sodomite groups is to
invade ordination Masses, surround the newly-ordained priests, and pelt
them with condoms.
Homosexual author Michael Swift claims that sodomites are
"masters of wit and ridicule."
Take for example the "Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence," a
self-described "order of gay male nuns" whose vows are to
"expiate stigmatic guilt and promulgate universal joy."
These sodomites dress up as Catholic nuns, and "rebaptize"
themselves with such names as Sister Homocycle Motorsexual; Sister
Sleaze Du Jour; Sister Florence Nightmare, R.N.; Sister Boom Boom;
Sister Mad, Power-Hungry B_tch; Sister Missionary Position; Sister
Chanel 2001; Sister Sadie Sadie the Rabbi Lady; Sister Helen Damnation;
Sister Opiate of the Masses; Sister Atrociata von Tasteless; Sister
Exposia; and Sister Perpetually Pruretic Prostate.
When Pope John Paul II visited San Francisco in 1987, the
"Sisters" "canonized" Harvey Milk, the murdered
homosexual city supervisor, and then conducted a parody of the Roman
Catholic Mass. They handed out foil-wrapped condoms at
"communion," and referred to them as "our holy
savior," who was to "vouchsafe the safety of our sexual
play." The enthusiastic "congregation" was then
instructed to inflate the condoms with "the guilt and shame
organized religion has foisted" on them, and then pop them.
The "ministries" of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
include "blessing" venereal disease clinics and assuring
everyone that having VD is "nothing to be worried or ashamed
about;" passing out buttons that say "YOU DESERVE A F_CK
TODAY;" and distributing "Perpetually Indulgent Rainchecks"
which promise, among other things, "a fabulous b___job,"
"prolonged t__work," "a scrumptious scat scene," and
"a f_ck you won't forget."
For anyone who is morbidly fascinated by the revolting practices of
sodomites, a "scat scene" involves sodomites defecating on
each other and then smearing the feces all over their bodies and rolling
in it like dogs.
Oppose Us and Die!
In 1989, Dr. Chuck McIlhenny, pastor of San Francisco's First
Orthodox Presbyterian Church, exercised his Constitutional rights of
free speech and assembly and helped engineer the defeat of a domestic
partnership law that would have forced the public to accept homosexual
immorality by compelling everyone to treat two sodomites as a family.
McIlhenny and his family soon became the focus of intense and vicious
sodomite hate. For three years, they received thousands of threatening
and harassing phone calls 24 hours a day, and many callers swore to
sodomize and then kill the McIlhenny's three daughters.
His home and church were firebombed. In 1990, sodomite groups
repeatedly vandalized the church and home with graffiti like "Dykes
for Choice," and attacked the crisis pregnancy center housed in the
church. Cowardly, skulking sodomites broke the church's windows so many
times the parishioners boarded them up permanently.
The "victim status" has allowed our society to devolve to
the point where merely muttering "fag" in the presence of a
drag queen is a Federal hate crime, but sodomite attacks upon churches
as described above are not only tolerated but even encouraged by some
Meanwhile, the full force of the Federal and state governments is
arrayed against neo-Nazis who primarily march in the streets and hold
mini-conventions. It is interesting to speculate as to what would happen
to these neo-Nazi groups if they assembled their members by the thousand
and began to physically attack Jewish synagogues.
This little exercise in logic leads one to question the now-obsolete
slogan "equal justice for all."
The Implications of Political Identity.
One does not have to be an experienced political operator to
recognize the great disadvantages under which conservative politicians
labor. The fights over the Supreme Court nominations of Robert Bork and
Clarence Thomas highlighted this fact. The mass media also treat
conservative politicians like Henry Hyde, William Dannemeyer, and Jesse
And, of course, those politicians who support the anti-life agenda
can get away with actual murder. For example, in 1987, a waitress
literally stumbled upon Senator Ted Kennedy (D.-olt) having sexual
intercourse with a woman on the floor of a private dining room at La
Brasserie, a popular Washington restaurant.
Kennedy's staff, used to covering up for their boss, pressured the
restaurant owner into threatening his staff with termination if they
spoke a word about the incident to reporters. Kennedy naturally refused
to discuss the incident just as he had refused to discuss his killing of
Mary Jo Kopechne at Chappaquiddick.
And this was the same person who stated that Robert Bork was morally
unfit to sit upon the United States Supreme Court! Kennedy claimed that
"Robert Bork's America is a land in which women would be forced
into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch
counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight
raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and
artists could be censored at the whim of the government, and the doors
of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of
Kennedy has fashioned a career out of being blatantly inconsistent
and has been getting away with it, purely because he is a rich
Neoliberal 'champion'. For instance, he is one of the Senate's strongest
advocates of stringent gun control laws, but he became incoherently
angry when one of his bodyguards was arrested inside a Senate office
building for carrying two submachine guns, a pistol, and 146 rounds of
Bogus "Hate Crimes."
Anyone who has an atom of common sense realizes that the many classes
of "victims" that are afflicting this country could not
possibly be as oppressed as they claim. After all, how many people know
real "haters" those who terrorize and assault people just
because they are Black, Jewish, or homosexual?
True "hate crimes" are, in reality, extremely rare.
Hate Crime Statistics.
Perhaps the most common lament of the garden-variety homosexual
revolves around the alleged "tidal wave" of
"anti-gay" hate crimes that are occurring in this country.
The press obediently trumpets the claim that "hate crimes
against gays" are increasing at the astronomical rate of 20 percent
(30 percent, 50 percent, pick a number) each year, and this is supposed
to galvanize progressive "straights" into taking action to
protect their persecuted brethren.
If the media and progressives would take the time to check the
figures, they would find that the reality surrounding "hate
crimes" is far different than what the homopropagandists would like
us to believe.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) statistics show that there were
4,558 documented hate crimes in 1991 nationwide. However, only 2,771 of
the 16,100 law enforcement agencies participating in the FBI's Uniform
Crime Reports program reported such crimes. Therefore, the number of
hate crimes actually committed in this country is probably closer to the
number that would result if all law enforcement agencies reported, i.e.,
(16,100/2, 771) X 4,558 = 26,500.
Using the FBI's ratios, all hate crimes would be broken out by
category as shown below.
NATIONAL BREAKDOWN OF HATE/BIAS CRIMES IN 1991
Reference. "Hatred By the Numbers." The Oregonian,
January 11, 1993, page B6.
There are several fascinating conclusions that can be drawn from
these numbers, as shown below.
(1) Only Two Percent of Homosexuals Are Ever Victims of Hate Crimes.
Sodomite propagandists claim that ten percent of the American population
is homosexual. Accepting the homosexual claim that only one-quarter
of all bias crimes against homosexuals are reported, this means that
the probability of any particular homosexual becoming victimized by a
reported or unreported bias crime in any one year is (1,590 X
4)/(25.5 million) = one in 4,000. The chances of a homosexual
living his entire 75-year lifespan without being victimized by a bias
crime are therefore 98 percent. In other words, only one in 50
homosexuals is ever a victim of a bias crime!
(2) Anti-Religious Hate Crimes Are More Prevalent. The above figures
show that there are more than three times as many hate crimes committed
against people because of their religion than there are due to
anti-homosexual bias. Many of these 'hate crimes' are committed by the
sodomites themselves the most obvious example being repeated violent
sodomite attacks on New York's St. Patricks Cathedral, as described
later in this chapter.
(3) Homosexuals Commit More Hate Crimes. As shown above, six percent
of bias crimes are committed against homosexuals, and three percent of
bias crimes are committed against heterosexuals. Crimes by homosexuals against
homosexuals and crimes by heterosexuals against heterosexuals are
not officially classified as bias crimes. Accepting the homosexual claim
that "ten percent of the American population is gay," this
means that homosexuals are (3%/10%)/(6%/90%) = 4.5 times more
likely to commit a hate crime against a normal person than vice-versa.
(4) Victim Ratios. The United States population in 1991 was about 255
million. 13.3 percent of our nation is Black, or about 34 million, and
75 percent of the population (about 192 million) is White. The
homosexual propagandists claim 10 percent, or 25.5 million.
This means that Black people are (0.35/34)/ (0.06/25.5) = 4.4 times
more likely to be victims of hate crimes in any one year than are
Examples of Bogus Hate Crimes.
Laird Wilcox, in his Hoaxer Project Report, documents more
than 100 cases of faked "hate crimes" committed by members of
certified racial, sexual, and religious "victim groups."
A very few examples are listed below.
According to the December 10, 1987 issue of the Los Angeles
Times, veteran pro-abortion activist and sodomite Frank Mendiola
called in numerous bomb threats to clinics, abortionists, and even his
own home so that "... you people, the media, will come down with a
harder line on those people who are harassing the clinics."
Pro-aborts packed the courtroom in Mendiola's support. Many members
of the "Committee for Reproductive Rights" appeared at his
trial, and Sherna Gluck of the CRR said that "Clearly, the whole
thing is very sad. I just feel very badly for him. He is a very fine
person, and I guess the worst one can say is he is just confused. I'm
sure it was [done] with the very best of intentions."
Mendiola had been very much in demand at pro-abortion rallies, where
he would read his letter written to President Reagan about how his
sister "Rose Elizabeth" died from a botched illegal abortion.
Mendiola sobbed about how "She bled to death on a kitchen table.
Yes, Mr. President, on a kitchen table." This story was proven to
be a complete lie when investigators discovered that Mendiola had
Mendiola's bogus story helps to call into question all of the other
pro-abortion propaganda stories of women who died of illegal abortions
before the procedure was legalized. It is estimated that at least
95 percent of these "Silent No More" stories are complete
fabrications, as proven in Chapter 59 of Volume II, "Maternal
Deaths Due to Abortion."
On the cover of its March 1985 ADL Bulletin, the
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith prominently featured a photograph
entitled "Desecration of a Jewish home in Kings Point, NY."
The photo, which showed a large Swastika on a door, was an obvious fake.
Even looking at the magazine, it was clear that the Swastika had been
scrawled on the photograph, not the door. This fact must have
also been even more plain to the people who put the magazine together.
The ADL compiles its own "hate crime" statistics by mailing
questionnaires to its subscribers, an obvious attempt to take advantage
of the gross overestimates that would be caused by self-selection. The
ADL also has a very wide definition of what a "hate crime" is:
Even pro-Palestinian graffiti is considered to fall in this
Terence Weaver of Kansas City was caught in the act of defacing
an art museum with racist and anti-Semitic graffiti. Weaver was
subsequently revealed to be an anti-racist who had talked openly
of luring a large group of neo-Nazis and Ku Klux Klansmen into a
building and then blowing them up.
At Ohio Dominican College in Columbus, Ohio, White student
Michael A. Smith was arrested for sending 13 threatening letters to
Black students and faculty. Forensic investigators discovered that
Janice D. Hamlet, a Black teacher at the school, had mailed the letters
because something that Smith had written in a term paper had
"outraged" her. She was charged with felony counts of ethnic
intimidation, but was allowed to attend Kent State University to
complete a Ph.D.
The New York offices of the radical sodomite group ACT-UP (AIDS
Contracted Through Unspeakable Perversions) was vandalized and set on
fire in 1990, and $90,000 in damage was caused. The arsonist merely set
archives on fire while ignoring all of the valuables and computer
equipment in the room. Fire Marshall Dan Brown said that "It
doesn't make sense." There was no forced entry and the only people
who had keys to the building were six ACT-UP members. Brown noted that
the arsonist had carefully locked the door with a key on his way
There are several characteristics that tend to indicate a faked
Strangely, most of these incidents seem to happen when important
and relevant political action of some sort is in process: Initiative
referendums or votes in the state legislatures, for instance.
Most bogus hate crimes are perpetrated on college campuses, where
sensitivity classes are often mandatory, and where awareness of the
"victim status" is higher than anywhere else in fact,
approaching the obsessive. In those neighborhoods where Whites and
Blacks live together, or where there is a large Jewish population,
racist and anti-Semitic graffiti and vandalism is much rarer.
It is important to note that authentic racist,
anti-Semitic, and anti-homosexual graffiti, vandalism, and hate crimes
are recognized as being counterproductive by authentic racist,
anti-Semitic, and anti-"gay rights" organizations. The result
of such actions is invariably outrage and action by the community,
including universal condemnation of all groups that may have perpetrated
the acts. In fact, police experience has shown that most of those people
who really hate Jews, Blacks, and sodomites will perpetrate their
crimes as anonymously as possible, and will forego painting or otherwise
leaving symbols and messages at the scenes of the crime.
One curious aspect of almost all bogus "hate crimes"
committed by Neoliberals is that there is no condemnation of the
perpetrator; instead, he or she is acknowledged to be "even more of
a victim," and anyone who dares criticize the hoaxer is immediately
The Hierarchies: Conclusion.
People get depressed when they are blocked in some basic way. When
they are unable to do something or say something that's on their
minds. In your case, you Americans have become one of the most
repressed, suppressed people on earth regarding what you can and
cannot say, and this is depressing you, I believe.
French psychiatrist vacationing in the United States.
The four 'old' social hierarchies were rotten and riddled with
injustice. It was precisely these injustices that led men and women of
good will to rise up and take positive action.
But some people never learn that a system inherently biased against
certain classes of beliefs is exactly as unjust as a system that is
biased against other beliefs. Now that we have completely inverted our
societal "pecking orders," religious and conservative
viewpoints are ridiculed, parodied, censored, and downgraded by the
media, the 'intelligentsia,' and those who wish to be socially correct.
We simply have the same old injustices all over again, but this time
with reversed polarities.
And so, men and women of good will are inevitably rising up once
Using Victimhood As a Weapon At Colleges.
Stamping Out the "Isms." The anti-life philosophy
teaches that the family is a hotbed of reactionary politics and
capitalism that must be radically altered if it cannot be destroyed
The Neofeminists often strenuously object when they are labeled
"anti-family," but their quotes and documents show that they
are deadly serious about eradicating the family so that they can step
into the void and take control of children's lives. Some Neofeminist
quotes attacking the family are shown in Figure 9-2. Many more are
listed in Chapter 129 of Volume III, "Neofeminism."
NEOLIBERALS ATTACK THE FAMILY
The little nuclear family is a paradigm that just doesn't work. It
doesn't work for white people or for black people. Why we are hanging
on to it, I don't know.
Novelist Toni Morrison, quoted in Time Magazine, May 22, 1989
Marriage has existed for the benefit of men; and has been a legally
sanctioned method of control over women ... We must work to destroy
it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition
for the liberation of women. Therefore, it is important for us to
encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually
The Declaration of Feminism, November 1971
Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the
women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution.
Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage.
Sheila Cronan, 1988 Houston NOW Conference for Women
It is still possible for weak, stupid, lazy, unambitious and
otherwise lesser equipped individuals to remain and make their way
within domestic work, both as housewives and as servants. As for the
rest, prostitution is always available.
Nobel Prize winners Alva and Gunnar Myrdal.
Crisis in the Population Question. 1930, page 249
In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away
from families and communally raise them.
Dr. MaryJo Bane, Assistant Professor of Education
at Wellesley College, quoted in David Kupelian and
Mark Masters. "The New McCarthyism." New
Dimensions Magazine, July 1990, page 22.
The family is the key institution for the determination and
perpetuation of women's subordination, the place where oppression is
most excruciatingly experienced ... Marriage, with its legal
obligations, institutionalized male authority and compulsory
heterosexuality, is incompatible with sexual freedom.
Mica Niva. "From Utopia to Scientific Feminism?"
Quoted in Lynne Segal. What is to Be Done
About the Family? Penguin Books/Socialist
Society, 1983, pages 66 and 69.
A woman who stays at home, caring for children and the house, leads
an extremely sterile existence. This kind of woman leads a parasitic
existence that can aptly be described as "legalized
prostitution" ... The time has not only come, it is past due,
when marriage and motherhood as a life's goal should be cut out of the
training of the female child ... The day has come when motherhood
should be the lot and privilege of a select minority.
Robin Morgan (editor). Sisterhood is Powerful.
New York: Vintage Books, 1970, page 246.
Engels identified the family as the basic unit of capitalist
society, and of female oppression. The family unit is a decadent,
energy-absorbing, destructive, wasteful institution for everyone
except the ruling class ... The modern individual family is founded on
the open or concealed domestic slavery of the wife, and modern society
is a mass composed of these individual families as its molecules. And
within the family, he [the man] is the bourgeois and the wife
represents the proletariat.
Robin Morgan (editor). Sisterhood is Powerful.
New York: Vintage Books, 1970, page 486.
Marriage makes you legally half a person, and what man wants to
live with half a person? ... I can't mate in captivity.
Gloria Steinem, 1971 and 1984 Newsweek
Magazine interviews. Summarized in Douglas
Johnson. "Rep. Chris Smith Targeted By
Planned Parenthood, Steinem." National Right
to Life News, April 10, 1986, page 6.
Despite their great successes (in particular, the Sexual Revolution),
the anti-lifers have failed to destroy the American family, since no
society of any size can long exist without the family unit.
Therefore, the anti-life (Neoliberal) activists have adopted a
chillingly effective strategy: They have grabbed control of every
institution of learning from preschools to medical schools.
The result has been obvious, even to the vast majority of Americans
who languish in the Muddled Middle. Our schools simply do not teach the
basics anymore. Instead, they preach the theology of revolution.
This is particularly true of our colleges and universities, which
receive freshmen primarily from a middle-class background. These
unfortunates are assumed to be infected with all manner of
"isms." Therefore, it is the holy duty of the faculty to
"raise their collective consciousness" with "diversity
education" and "sensitivity training." Uniformity,
conformity, and tolerance are rewarded above all. Those who dare display
original thought or who adhere to a conservative doctrine of any type
are relentlessly pressured by professors and peers to
Codifing the "Isms."
Many universities and colleges are now literally placing
inoffensiveness on an equal footing with honor by writing "social
honor codes" to enforce Politically Correct thought and action. A
paragraph in the Princeton Alumni Weekly reveals that the
University believes that being rid of "isms" is just as
important as being honorable;
... the administration is considering the implementation of a
social honor code to complement the existing academic honor code.
Focusing on respect for individual rights, the proposed code would
concentrate on specific violations of these rights, including
incidents of sexism, racism, class discrimination, and homophobia. As
with the academic honor code, students would be obligated to report
any violations of the social honor code, and incoming freshmen would
be required to sign the code before matriculating.
The implications of such a "social honor code" are
staggering in their scope. Not only must students promise to abide by
the code, but they are also sworn to squeal on anyone who violates it.
The Princeton honor code, by the way, demands dismissal of any student
who violates it. So will the "social honor code." Naturally,
this gross expansion of the original Honor Code drastically reduces its
effectiveness and meaning.
Therefore, under a social honor code, a student would be dismissed
from Princeton for;
telling any joke considered 'racist,' 'sexist,' 'classist,' or
'homophobic' by the
campus Thought Police, or
irritating or offending in any way, even if inadvertently, any
minority, or sodomite. This would include
"exclusionary practices," i.e.,
leaving a person out of a conversation or not inviting
them to a party with
However, the same Princeton student would not be incur an
Honor Code violation for;
using, buying, or selling dangerous illegal drugs;
engaging in perverted sex acts, including prostitution, sodomy and
manufacturing, selling, or possessing child pornography; or
committing any kind of act against White males that would be
unforgivable if the same act were committed against a
member of a
certified 'victim class.'
College and University Propaganda.
The University of Texas (Austin) requires only one course in English
composition, freshman-level English 306. The class textbook, entitled
"Racism and Sexism," is composed entirely of left-wing essays
denouncing the incurably corrupt American "system" and
bemoaning the fate of various self-appointed victim groups.
The book's editor, a female New Jersey sociologist, has students
perform a "class analysis of shopping malls." She explains
that "They go to a boutiquey mall and a mall for the masses. I have
them count how many public toilets are in each, and bring back samples
of the toilet paper. It makes class distinctions visible."
Isn't is comforting to know that the principles of rigorous
scientific investigation are still being taught at our institutions of
And so, while our college students play touchy-feely with toilet
paper, we scratch our heads and wonder why Japanese college students are
light-years ahead of ours in terms of discipline and knowledge.
Among other "wisdom," the "Racism and Sexism"
text states that, while all Whites are by definition racist in
their thoughts and actions, minorities "... may discriminate
against white people or even hate them," but are not capable
This kind of nonsense, not surprisingly, has infected influential
Blacks who are always eager to grab headlines. Gus Savage, a Chicago
Democrat, went so far as to say that "only whites can be
racists." This was the same Gus Savage who screamed at a
reporter from the Washington Times "I don't talk to you
White motherf_ckers. . . !"
Lest anyone take offense at such incandescent profanity, remember
that Neoliberals claim that this is not a racist statement.
Now imagine what would have happened if David Duke had shouted that
same statement at a Black reporter!
In another incident, Molefi Asant, Chairperson of African-American
studies at Temple University, recently stated that "Either you
support multiculturalism in American education, or you support the
maintenance of white supremacy." In other words, "You
non-People of Color out there had better support us and give in to all
of our demands or you are all Nazis!"
This all-on or all-off mentality infects women's studies programs all
over the country as well. Perhaps professors are influenced by the
"Redstockings Manifesto" in Robin Morgan's Neofeminist
anthology Sisterhood is Powerful, which is used as a text in many
colleges and universities. This 'Manifesto' states that "All men
have oppressed women ... The most slanderous evasion of all is that
women can oppress men."
Paula S. Rothenberg echoes this view in her anthology "Racism
and Sexism: An Integrated Study." Rothenberg describes how the very
foundation of sexism and racism is subordination, exercised only
by Whites over Blacks and only by men over women. Therefore,
reverse racism and reverse sexism by definition cannot exist!
Imagine what the response would be if a White professor adopted a
parallel line of "reasoning," and began to teach that only
Black men can be rapists, but that White men are incapable of such
This view is not mere posturing; it is a form of blanket history
revisionism by which Neofeminists attempt to perpetrate all kinds of
atrocities while alleging that they (the Neofeminists) are simply not capable
of such activities and therefore the atrocities must be the product of
feverish and overworked 'right-wing' imaginations.
Putting Teeth in the Propaganda.
This brand of unthinking propaganda is enforced by
"anti-harassment" codes and statutes, by which approved groups
of victims can punish those who step out of line or do anything that
they decide offends them. The offenders are often sentenced to
"racial awareness seminars" or "anti-homophobic
sensitivity training" that enforces the mode of approved thinking.
If the offender continues to show a bad attitude, he or she can be
ostracized from "proper company" or even dismissed from the
Emory University, Atlanta, is one of more than a hundred colleges and
universities that have enacted "discriminatory harassment"
statutes which ban "conduct, oral or written, graphic or physical,
directed against any person or group."
Consider the incredible breadth of this statute for a moment. Anyone
who even attempts to present both sides of the moral issues
surrounding homosexuality, for example, can officially be prosecuted by
the campus Thought Police for "harassment." In other words,
such institutions of higher learning (where the free exchange of ideas
is allegedly treasured) have cordoned off vast areas of speech that they
consider to be "inappropriate."
Some of the more ridiculous instances of such censorship are
Men are allowed to enroll in Kenyon College's course entitled
"Biology of Feminine Sexuality," but are forbidden to
The University of Michigan has rules against "failing to
include someone in a conversation." The U of M also requires that
everyone use certain terms in speech and writing: "Sexual
preference" is forbidden "sexual orientation" is
allowable. "Spouse" is not allowed, "life partner"
is. Students and faculty must use the term "personhole
cover" instead of "manhole cover."[51,52]
The University of Connecticut has issued a proclamation
prohibiting "inappropriately directed laughter" and
"conspicuous exclusion of students from conversations."
Madison University's Student Senate attempted to ban Halloween
parties because students, supposedly emboldened by the anonymity
offered by wearing masks, might inflict "poking, pinching,
rude comments" and the like on women.
The New York University Law School scheduled a mock court trial
on a lesbian mother's custody rights. Homosexual students forced its
cancellation, alleging that "Writing arguments [against the
mother's case] is hurtful to a group of people and thus hurtful to all
In the Spring of 1990, Mt. Holyoke College sponsored a
"Lesbian/Bisexual Awareness Week." Conservative students
highlighted the absurdity of this activity by holding their own
"Heterosexual Awareness Week." They were attacked by, among
others, University President Elizabeth Kennan, for violating the
"spirit of community."
At the University of Pennsylvania, the Student Activities
Council shut down the conservative publication The Red and Blue.
Their excuse was that it had violated the Campus Harassment Policy by
criticizing the lavish college funding for the Lesbian, Gay, and
Bisexual Alliance. The bogus charges were "failing to respect the
personal integrity of others" and by "creating an
intimidating and offensive academic, living, and work
This, then, is a very important point: It is quite obvious that many
of our colleges and universities are politically indoctrinating their
students. If the students do not toe the line and parrot the accepted
"party line," they will be subject to intense peer and faculty
pressure. If they persist in their "unmutual" behavior, they
may even be subject to civil or criminal prosecution.
This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought, but for
imagination as well, in places where such qualities were at one time
And so, our college students now suffer censorship in the name of
free speech, intolerance in the name of tolerance, and oppression in the
name of freedom.
George Orwell would have been proud!
Studies in Contrasts: Case Study 1.
Let's be clear: the idea that radicals or liberals have some PC
[politically correct] yardstick by which we judge one another and
others is a gross fabrication ... We neither march monolithically to
the beat of a single drummer nor seek to impose a singular political
correctness on the world.
Neoliberal writer Christopher Phelps.
Introduction: Dartmouth College.
This chapter has provided some examples of how pervasive the
Neoliberal double-standards and "victim mentality" are in this
society. However, the dominance of such thinking is most evident at our
colleges and universities.
The following paragraphs describe just a few of the more bizarre
manifestations of the "victim mentality" at just one Eastern
College Dartmouth and these incidents show how the dreaded Thought
Police strangle free expression (and even free thought) in a systematic
and ruthless manner.
In 1986, Dartmouth College was one of several Eastern universities
that saw Neoliberal students illegally erect "anti-apartheid
shanties" in prominent areas. These "shanties" inevitably
became popular party sites for Neoliberals, and trash rapidly
accumulated around them.
After more than a month, ten conservative Dartmouth students became
fed up with the eyesore and attempted to drag away the trash. They were
immediately hauled before a college disciplinary committee, which threw
three of them out of the college permanently.
During his trial before the Committee, one of the conservatives a
Black had unbelievable abuse heaped on him. He was called
"nigger," "Uncle Tom," "Fascist,"
"bigot," "Nazi," "Brownshirt," and
"Klansman," among many other unprintable epithets. There
was never any doubt about the outcome of the "trial;" he was
suspended from Dartmouth for a year.
The Leftist students, who illegally built the "shanties,"
defied written and spoken orders to disassemble the shanties; twice
occupied the President's office and twice blocked all the entrances at
the Administration building; aggressively defended shanties and were
arrested by police; and assaulted both police and conservative students.
What was the reaction of the College to this pattern of illegal and
violent activity? Dartmouth President David McLaughlin completely
excused the actions of the Leftist students and refused to punish them
at all, alleging in a letter of excuse to local police that "They
did not realize the gravity of their offense." The Lefties,
overjoyed at receiving a carte blanche from the college president
himself, continued to block access to campus buildings, including the
library, and spray-painted anti-apartheid slogans all over the campus in
broad daylight without the slightest fear of punishment.
Violence With Teeth in It.
Other violent incidents have demonstrated the strength of the
stranglehold the Neoliberals have at Dartmouth College.
Benjamin Hart was one of the founders of The Dartmouth Review,
a conservative campus weekly that regularly pokes fun at university
policy. In 1983, he was tackled by a Black university administrator as
he was delivering newspapers. The administrator then bit him so hard on
the chest that he broke off three teeth in the act.
The response of the Dartmouth faculty to this vicious assault was
incredible. They voted 113 to 5 to censure The Dartmouth Review
for provoking the attack! The toothy administrator, of course, got off
Sodomites and Academic Freedom.
It is exceedingly dangerous to one's academic career to dare to
oppose the campus gay student associations (GSAs) in any way. Teresa
Polenz of Dartmouth learned this lesson the hard way.
She attended an April 29, 1984 meeting of the Dartmouth GSA as a
reporter for The Dartmouth Review in order to try to find out
what the organization did with the tax-free $500 it received from the
college every year. This money was extracted from tuition and Dartmouth
alumni contributions, so the Review felt that accountability was
A sodomite student, in a rare moment of honesty, revealed how the
money was put to use: "We have parties. Wait until you see our
The day after the meeting, Dean Edward Shanahan of the school told
Polenz if she were not in his office in 15 minutes, she would be
suspended. Shanahan demanded that she sign a sworn affidavit stating
that nothing that happened at the meeting would be published in the Review.
She refused, and so the college moved to put her on trial for
"eavesdropping," even though she had openly attended the
sodomite meeting. The college gave her no right to call or cross-examine
witnesses and no right to a lawyer; and, even more incredibly, the
prosecution was given the right to act as judge in the case! In other
words, this was a Dartmouth sodomite Kangaroo Kourt. Administrators told
her that suspension was a foregone conclusion.
The only thing that saved Polenz was a blistering assault by The
Wall Street Journal on the Dartmouth "justice system."
Remember that Neoliberal skulduggery can only be accomplished in
privacy; shining the light of publicity on their activities makes them
melt back into the decaying moral ooze from whence they came.
Studies in Contrasts: Case Study 2.
They give me a stick, they give me a gun,
they pay me 50 Gs to have some fun.
A full moon and a full gun
makes for a night of fun.
Los Angeles Police Department computer messages.
The LAPD at Work: Introduction.
It is interesting to observe and compare the reactions of various
Neoliberal groups to the violent abuse of two separate groups, one of
which is "Politically Correct," and one which is not.
A comparison of the wide range of reactions of the Los Angeles power
structure to police brutality directed towards two different entities is
particularly fascinating and revealing.
First: The Rescuers.
On March 25, 1989, hundreds of pro-lifers staged a series of massive
rescue missions at Los Angeles area abortuaries.
The Los Angeles Police Department was exceptionally brutal when
arresting these non-violent, non-resisting protestors. One wave of
police (who had removed their nametags and badges to hinder positive
identification) would move in and savagely beat rescuers, and then a
second wave would go in and make arrests.
The pro-lifers were tightly bound and lifted by police who jammed
their fingers up the rescuer's nostrils and into their eye sockets.
Rescuers were dragged by their hair and ears, and mounted police horses
"accidentally" and repeatedly stepped on them. Police stood on
rescuer's backs and repeatedly slammed their faces into the concrete
A total of 600 injuries including seven broken bones were reported
out of a total of 1,100 arrests in two days.
When the Los Angeles police removed the rescuers to the booking
areas, they sexually molested pro-life women and strip-searched them in
a mocking, exaggerated, and sexually explicit manner.
The reaction of the city power structure to this massive brutality
and abuse was deafening silence. The Mayor's office did not say a word.
The American Civil Liberties Union was utterly silent. Congress turned
its collective back.
When the Civil Rights Commission considered investigating police and
pro-abortion violence against pro-lifers, Congressman Don Edwards
(D.-Ca.) threatened to defund the Commission entirely.
Next: The Black Man.
On March 3, 1991, several Los Angeles police stopped Rodney King, a
Black man, for speeding, and then beat him with nightsticks.
Unfortunately for the police, an observer with a camcorder taped the
The reaction by the Los Angeles power structure to this incident was
immediate and forceful, because the Black man was a member of a
"victim class," whereas the pro-lifers were not.
Ten United States Congressmen denounced the police violence and
demanded an in-depth investigation, citing a long list of violent
incidents involving LA police but significantly not mentioning
the brutality inflicted on more than 600 pro-life rescuers just two
years before. These congressmen spluttered that it was "the most
heinous, vicious, brutal police brutality case that has been recorded
for all time."
FBI Director William S. Sessions promised an "in-depth
investigation." Congressman Don Edwards, head of the Judiciary
Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights, scheduled extensive
hearings within one week of the incident.
Remember that Edwards was the same man who had threatened to defund
the Civil Rights Commission for merely scheduling hearings on the same
kind of violence directed against pro-lifers.
The American Civil Liberties Union, which had been utterly silent
when pro-lifers asked them for help two years previously, paid $35,000
for a full-page ad in the March 12 Los Angeles Times showing a
cop wielding a baton with the headline, "WHO DO YOU CALL WHEN THE
GANG WEARS BLUE UNIFORMS?" The ad demanded the immediate
resignation of Police Chief Daryl Gates, and Los Angeles Mayor Tom
Bradley echoed this demand.
For three months after Rodney King was beat up, the incident received
enduring attention in the national media. However, of the major articles
written on brutality committed by the Los Angeles Police, more than 500
mentioned the King incident and exactly two even mentioned
the brutality directed against pro-lifers.
Of course, the rest is history. When a Simi County jury acquitted the
four policemen responsible for the beating, the City of Los Angeles held
its now-famous Rodney King Memorial Riot, which killed more than 50
people and caused more than a billion dollars in property damage.
Among others, California State Senator Diane Watson (a Democrat),
said "I blame Reagan."
Violence: For the Left Only.
Violence in the Old and New Hierarchies.
Under the 'old' hierarchy, slave owners could beat, abuse, maim, and
kill their slaves with impunity. Sexual perverts became social pariahs
and were often lynched. Wives were routinely beaten, but remained in
abusive relationships because they simply had no effective recourse.
Under the 'new' hierarchy, homosexuals, minorities, "peace"
activists, animal-rights groups, anti-apartheid organizations, and
"women's rights" groups can advocate the most extreme violence
and terrorism and actually be applauded for it. However, those labeled
'right-wing' may in no manner advocate even the mildest form of
peaceful civil disobedience without being pilloried by the press.
The Barry and Carmichael Show.
For example, the Mayor of Washington, DC, Marion Barry, has called
abortion clinic bombings "terrorist acts," and has compared
the bombers to Adolf Hitler. This is curious in light of the fact that
Barry, in the mid-1960s, headed the Washington, DC Chapter of the
Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), whose national
chairman was Stokely Carmichael.
Carmichael said that "[Martin Luther] King's death made it a lot
easier for a lot of Negroes they know it's time to get guns
now." After King was shot, 595 arson fires were set in urban
areas, and Carmichael said "That was light stuff compared with what
is about to happen."
Barry never denounced Carmichael or this violence, of course,
because it was a Neoliberal, politically correct issue, which is always
somehow "different" (just ask him). Therefore, Barry is saying
that 595 arson fires, many randomly set, and many of which resulted in
deaths or injuries, are justified, but the approximately 50 arson fires
at abortion clinics since 1970, none of which have resulted in death or
injury, are "terrorism."
The Sodomites and Blood Terrorism.
Homosexuals can agitate for extreme violence on a massive scale and
not a peep of condemnation can be heard. For example, homosexual
activist Robert Schwab stated that "If [AIDS] research money is not
forthcoming at a certain level by a certain date, all gay males should
give blood. Whatever action is required to get national attention is
valid. If that includes blood terrorism, so be it." However, by
comparison, mere silence or inattention by the public is, according to
the sodomites, "genocide."
Beatings and Burnings.
Today, if a husband beats his wife, he must face the condemnation of
women's groups, the media, the court system, and society in general.
However, if a wife throws gasoline on her sleeping husband and burns him
to death, she becomes the subject of a major motion picture starring
Of course, as described below, Neofeminists consider themselves
literally incapable of abusing men in any way.
For more information regarding pro-abortion violence, see Chapter 19.
For further information on sodomite violence, see Chapter 118 of Volume
III, "Homosexual Tactics." And information on Communist
genocide may be found in Chapters 93 and 96 of Volume III.
But Seriously, Now ...
Nothing is more comical that a deadly-earnest person making a total
fool of him(her)self and being entirely unaware of the fact. This
principle holds true for producers making awful B-grade horror flicks,
and it certainly applies to grim-faced Neofeminists who think that they
are striking colossal blows for women's rights.
Holes in the Ground ...
The Sacramento, California City Council is one of the very few in the
country that is comprised mostly of women. So, like good Neofeminists,
they set out to prove that, like men, they can successfully grapple with
the toughest and most complex social issues of them all.
They were convinced that the good citizens of their fair city were
grievously offended by those awful, sexist MANholes scattered
everywhere. Therefore, they courageously sponsored the "Manhole
Terminology Change Contest."
After reviewing such inspired entries as "Person-Access
Chamber," they settled upon "maintenance hole," and
decreed that all of Sacramento's official maps and documents would
reflect this change. The cost of these changes was not specified, but
those many Sacramento citizens grievously offended and injured by the
ingrained sexism of the city maintenance department may now breathe much
easier, realizing that their all-woman City Council knows their civil
rights from a hole in the ground.
Ted and His Flying Johns.
What discussion of the dreaded self-appointed "word police"
would be complete without input from Ted Turner, owner of Cable News
Turner has been (dis)honored as a "Humanist of the Year" by
the American Humanist Association, and he alternates between periodic
irrational tirades against pro-life "bozos" and sniveling
sessions on the ugliness of censorship.
Displaying a regrettable lack of common sense, he banned the word
"foreign" on CNN, requiring newscasters to say
"international" instead. Syndicated columnist Lewis Grizzard
asked, "Does Ted Turner have an airplane? I'm sure he does. What
does it say in the restroom? Do not flush any international objects down
Don't It Beet All!
The very ultimate in anti-discrimination laws is the "Colorado
Act Concerning the Creation of a Cause of Action for the Disparagement
of Perishable Agricultural Food Products" (this is for real, folks.
Honest). The purpose of the CACCCADPAFP would have been to ban written
or verbal "disparagement" of meats, dairy products, and
produce grown in the State of Colorado.
This measure was backed by national and local animal-rights groups
who seem to have extended their areas of concern rather dramatically.
The supporters of the CACCCADPAFP stated with straight faces that we
human beings "have been oppressing vegetables for years."
Perhaps we are all guilty of "mammal-ism."
What next? If insulting vegetables oppresses them, eating them
must be even worse! If humans can't eat animals or vegetables, what's
left? Rock salt and vitamins?
But perhaps we been oppressing even salt, gravel, coal and tar for
too long. Just think of the indignities that have been heaped
upon sand by millions of cats in kitty-litter boxes for decades!
Hopefully, someone will start a new group called People for the Ethical
Treatment of Sand (PETS) to combat this atrocity.
Humor aside, this would not be an impossible scenario if certain
strange beliefs gained ascendancy in our society. Catholic 'priest'
Matthew Fox, head of the Institute for Creation Spirituality, addresses
trees as "tree people" and considers stones to be "rock
people." Fox, whose constant companion is the female witch Starhawk,
embraces the "New Age" concept of 'theagenesis,' which holds
that the earth itself is a living organism ('Gaia') that is evolving
towards a divine state of godhood.
For more information on 'theagenesis' and other "New Age"
beliefs, see Chapter 130 of Volume III.
Memorize These Books!
Army generals and experienced attorneys often wish out loud that
their opponent(s) would write a book. Therefore, it was not much of a
surprise when various groups of self-appointed word police finally
compiled and issued dictionaries of "prohibited" words.
These include Rosalie Maggio's The Dictionary of Bias-Free Usage:
A Guide to Nondiscriminatory Language (Oryx Press, 1991); Casey
Miller and Kate Swift's The Handbook of Non-Sexist Writing
(Harper/Collins, 1990), and Val Dumande's The Elements of Non-Sexist
Usage: A Guide to Inclusive Spoken and Written Language
The reaction to these books was varied, but experienced writers and
authors almost universally derided not only the books, but the idea
behind them as well.
Christina Hoff Sommers, Clark University [Worcester, Massachusetts]
professor of philosophy, identified the neo-Fascist thinking behind such
volumes; "There's a kind of exotic hunt for bias in language. It's
Orwellian. These people have given up on real politics, so it's been
sublimated into these arcane intellectual games. But if you can change
language, you can change the world. The next step in the colleges is
that many professors will begin to enforce this. Papers will be returned
if students don't use he-slash-she. They'll pass out lists of inclusive
A few of these authors went far beyond merely hunting down
"sexist" terms, and became almost obsessive in their desire to
eradicate every vestige of male-oriented verbiage in the English
language. For example, one "forbidden word" was
"seminar", because it was allegedly derived from a
male-oriented word "semen." The proposed replacement, believe
it or not, was "ovular."
The Multicultural Management Program of the University of Missouri
School of Journalism issued a nasty-word book entitled The Dictionary
of Cautionary Words in mid-1990. Part of the introduction to this
book states that "Reporters and editors must be aware of the
following words, many objectionable."
The hundreds of words listed include some genuinely objectionable
words. However, this small list is expanded a hundred-fold to include
the words "airhead," "banana,"
"barracuda," "burly," "Charlie,"
"dear," "dizzy," "dutch treat,"
"feminine," "fried chicken," "gorgeous,"
"gyp," "housewife," "Ivan,"
"jock," "lazy," "pert,"
"petite," "rubbing noses," "senior
citizens," "shiftless," "stunning,"
"ugh," "whitebread," and thousands of others.
Why are these words "objectionable?" According to the book,
"'Burly' is an adjective too often associated with large
Black man, implying
ignorance, and considered offensive in this
"'Dear' is a term of endearment objectionable to some."
"'Fried chicken' is a loaded phrase when used carelessly and
stereotype referring to the cuisine of Black
"'Illegal alien' is often used to refer to Mexicans and Latin
believed to be in the United States without visas; the
preferred term is
"'Senior citizens;' do not use for anyone under 65. Do not
as elderly, senile, matronly, or well-preserved. Do not
use 'dirty old man,'
'codger,' 'coot,' "geezer,' 'silver fox,'
'old-timers,' 'Pop,' 'old buzzard.'"
"'Ugh' is a guttural word used to mimic American Indian
Naturally, the book doesn't list any adjectives that
"non-victim" groups, such as Whites or Catholics, might find
offensive. Words that do not appear in their book include
"honky," "Whitey," "cracker,"
"religious fanatic," "dago," "wop," "mick,"
"frog," "kraut," "hunky," and
After visiting the senior citizen's home, the burly jocks jumped into
their gorgeous Barracuda with their pert, petite housewives and, after a
Dutch treat at the local Kentucky Fried Chicken, drove to a stunning
overlook for some nose-rubbing.
Gad. How offensive can you get?
References: The Victim Status.
 Marshall K. Kirk and Erastes Pill. "The Overhauling of
Straight America." Guide Magazine, October and November
 Malcolm Muggeridge, quoted in Jonathon Green. The Cynic's
Lexicon. New York: St. Martin's Press. 1984, 220 pages.
 "Rum, Romanism, and Doug Wilder." National Review,
August 12, 1991, page 39. Also see "On the Record." National
Review, August 12, 1991, page 10.
 Syndicated columnist Carl Rowan, quoted in "On the
Record." National Review, August 26, 1991, page 8.
 John McKnight. "When Helping Hurts, Why 'Servanthood' is
Bad." Messenger Magazine, January 1992, pages 10 to 13.
 "Sister Souljah" (Lisa Williamson). Quoted in
"Under the Rainbow: Jesse Jackson Shelters a Repulsive Bully."
World Magazine, July 4, 1992, page 14. Also quoted in
"Quotes," World Magazine, June 20, 1992, page 5.
 Beth Mydans. "On the Streets the LA Four Are Seen as
Victims." The Oregonian, September 11, 1992, page A4.
 As described in "PC Watch." World Magazine,
November 7, 1992, page 5.
 "The Week." National Review, February 14, 1986,
 George F. Will. "America's Slide Into the Sewer." Newsweek,
July 30, 1990, page 64.
 Sinead O'Connor, quoted in Rolling Stone, October 4,
1990, and in Mark Masters and David Kupelian. "Sneak Attack on
America's Culture." New Dimensions Magazine, June 1991,
pages 16 to 21.
 Angie Dabine. "Crapshoot on Broadway." Willamette
Week [Portland, Oregon], February 21-27, 1991, page 18.
 Steve Cokely, quoted in the New York Times, July 26,
1988, article entitled "Black-Jewish Hostility." Also
recounted in Milton Himmelfarb. "Jackson, the Jews, and the
Democrats." National Review, November 7, 1988, page 42.
 "Dubious Achievement Awards of 1991!" Esquire
Magazine, January 1992, pages 94 to 119.
 David Horowitz. "The Radical Left and the New Racism."
New Dimensions Magazine, December 1990, pages 20 to 37. Also see
"Farrakhan and His Religion: Waiting for 'The New Mecca.'" Insight,
November 11, 1985, pages 7 to 25. A detailed expose on Louis Farrakhan
and his empire.
 Benjamin Hooks of the National Association for the Advancement
of Colored People (NAACP) on Bernard Goetz. "The Week." National
Review, July 31, 1987, page 12.
 "The Week." National Review, January 31, 1986,
 Virginia Employment Commission and the United States Department
of Labor, Employment, and Training Administration. Validity
Generalization Manual. Section A, "Job Family Scoring."
Race norming is described in Robert G. Holland. "Big Brother's Test
Scores." National Review, September 3, 1990, page 35.
 Rachel Zimmerman. "The Perfect Victim: Azalea Cooley."
Willamette Week [Portland, Oregon], November 26-December 3, 1992,
 Phil Stanford. "And Now, For the Not-Too-Strange Case of
Azalea Cooley." The Oregonian, January 12, 1993, page B1.
 "Echoes of the 50s in Rooney Witch Hunt." The Wall
Street Journal, February 14, 1990.
 Mike Wallace of CBS, quoted in Joseph Farah. "How
Homosexual Thought Police Muzzled Rooney." American Family
Association Journal, March 1990, page 20.
 "The Week." National Review, February 19, 1988,
 William Cheshire. The Arizona Republic. Incident
recounted in the Family Research Newsletter, Fall 1989, page 3.
 Paul Weyrich. "Politically Correct Fascism on Our
Campuses." New Dimensions Magazine, June 1991, page 44.
 Political science professor Jean Betheke Elshtain. Quoted in
Stephen Goode. "Efforts to Deal With Diversity Can Go Astray."
Insight Magazine, September 10, 1990, pages 15 to 19.
 "New Sexual Victims: Cross Dressers." Family
Research Newsletter, January- March 1991, page 5.
 "Faith and Homosexuality" and "Discriminate
Against Homosexuals?" Family Research Newsletter,
January-March 1991, pages 6 and 7.
 Keith Stimely. "Meet the Apocalypse Man: Quotations from
Chairman Parfrey." PDXS Magazine (Portland, Oregon), March
2-15, 1992, pages 4 and 5.
 E. Michael Jones. "The Pope and the Condom
Worshippers." Fidelity Magazine, October 1987, pages 32-44.
Also see Just Out, January 1990, page 10.
 Henry V. King. "Cardinal O'Connor Calls On Catholics to
Counter 'War Against the Family.'" The Wanderer, January 24,
1991, page 1.
 John Leo. "The Gay Tide of Catholic-Bashing." U.S.
News and World Report, April 1, 1991, page 15. Also reprinted in the
April 14, 1991 issue of Our Sunday Visitor, page 19.
 John Leo. "When Activism Becomes Gangsterism." U.S.
News and World Report, February 5, 1990, page 18.
 "Mahony and the Times." National Catholic
Register, February 11, 1990, page 4.
 "A Pall of Evil." From the Mail, The Wanderer,
March 14, 1991, page 3.
 John Allec. "No More Guilt! A Tour of the Territory of
Perpetual Indulgence." BodyPolitic ("A Magazine for Gay
Liberation"), March 1982, pages 30 to 32.
 "The McIlhennys: Victims of Hate." Focus on the Family
Citizen, August 20, 1990, pages 14 and 15.
 Washington Times, March 2, 1989.
 "The Prince of Hacks." National Review, July
31, 1987, page 15.
 "The Week." National Review, February 14, 1986,
 United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
Reference Data Book and Guide to Sources, Statistical Abstract of the
United States. 1990 (110th Edition). United States Government
 "Pro-Life Action League Helps Expose Pro-Abortion
'Bomber.'" The Advocate (publication of Advocates for Life
Ministries), Portland, Oregon, May 1988, page 10. Also see Patt
Morrison. "Zealot's Tale: Pro-Choice Activist Faces Sentencing in
Bomb Threats to Stir Sympathy for Cause." Los Angeles Times,
December 10, 1987, pages F1, F4, and F6.
 Laird Wilcox. THE HOAXER PROJECT REPORT: Racist and
Anti-Semitic Graffiti, Harassment and Violence: An Essay on Hoaxes and
Fabricated Incidents. December 1990. Available from Laird Wilcox,
Editorial Research Service, Post Office Box 2047, Olathe, Kansas 66061.
Telephone/FAX: (913) 829-0609.
 French psychiatrist vacationing in the United States, quoted by
Benjamin J. Stein in "Antipathies," The American Spectator,
December 1991, page 32.
 "Princeton's Social Honor Code." National Review,
July 22, 1988, page 57.
 James Hitchcock. "Family is as Family Does." Human
Life Review, Fall 1980, pages 52 to 70.
 "Short Endings." Fidelity Magazine, June 1990, page
 Jerry Adler. "Taking Offense." Newsweek
Magazine, December 24, 1990, pages 48 to 55.
 "Redstockings Manifesto." Sisterhood is Powerful
(Robin Morgan, editor). New York: Vintage Books, 1970. Page 534.
 Paul Harvey. "Name of the Game is Intolerance." Conservative
Chronicle, June 12, 1990, page 27.
 Messenger Magazine, January 1992, page 14.
 "The Week." National Review, December 8, 1989,
 Christopher Phelps. "New McCarthyism Or Old? The
Intellectual Farce of 'Political Correctness.'" The Portland
[Oregon] Alliance, July 1991, pages 6 and 7. Also see
"Counter-Revolution." National Review, April 25, 1986,
 "The Shanty Wars Are About Much More." National
Review, May 9, 1986, page 20. Also see "The Second Dartmouth
Case." National Review, April 11, 1986, page 20.
 Leslie Hanscom. "Left-Wingers and Ivy Leaguers." Conservative
Digest, April 1985, page 22.
 Christopher Commission findings as reported on Page 2A of the
July 10, 1991 USA Today, "Messages Tell the Story."
 Peter Arnold. "A Victory for the First Amendment." Conservative
Digest, February 1985, page 17.
 Stanley Interrante. "Operation Rescue Marked By Massive
Arrests and Police Brutality." The Wanderer, April 13, 1989,
pages 1 and 8.
 Free Congress Foundation. Family, Law and Democracy Report,
November 1989, page 11.
 Patricia Edmonds, Knight-Ridder News Service. "Members of
Congress Want Federal Probe of LA Police Brutality." The
Oregonian, March 13, 1991, page A13.
 Debra J. Saunders. "Crime and Violence the Real
Enemies." The Oregonian, May 6, 1992, page D9.
 Stokely Carmichael, quoted in "Mayor Barry and the
Bombings." Cal Thomas and Wayne Stayskal. Liberals for Lunch.
Westchester, Illinois: Crossway Books, 1986. Pages 61 and 62.
 "Filler Items." The Realist, January-February
1991, page 8.
 Chicago Tribune News Service. "Don't it Beet All: Vegetable
Slander." The Oregonian, March 20, 1991. Page A14.
 Anthony Flint, The Boston Globe. "The Politics of
Language." The Oregonian, March 18, 1992, pages D1 and D9.
 Mike Royko. "Attack of the Airheads." Readers
Digest. October 1990, pages 91 and 92. "What's Wrong With
Teaching Politeness? Plenty!" Twin Cities Christian,
September 19, 1991, page 16A.
Further Reading and Resources: The Victim Status.
Stephen L. Carter. Reflections of an Affirmative Action Baby.
1991, Basic Books, 286 pages. Reviewed by Arch Puddington on pages 43
and 44 of the December 1991 issue of The American Spectator. The
first tenured Black professor at Yale Law School shows how favored
treatment can erode the will and survival instincts of an entire race of
R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. The Liberal Crack-Up.
New York City:
Simon & Schuster, 1984. 256 pages. Reviewed by Victor Gold on page
35 of the March 1985 issue of Conservative Digest. His thesis:
"New Age Liberalism is no longer the sensible, tolerant, highly
principled body of thought that liberalism was in decades past. Sometime
in the 1960s or early 1970s, it cracked up into a riot of enthusiasms,
usually contradictory, always extremist, often non compos mentis."
The Wilcox Collection of Contemporary Political Movements.
the largest collection of extremist literature (both from the Right and
the Left) in the world, occupying more than 2,000 feet of shelf space in
the form of 10,000 books, pamphlets, and serial publications, 800
audiocassette tapes, and many other materials from approximately 8,000
organizations. This library is housed at the University of Kansas in
© American Life League BBS 1-703-659-7111
This is a chapter of the Pro-Life Activist's Encyclopedia,
published by American Life League.