Sing a Little Louder!
I found myself in danger, I cried out in despair
I prayed, "Lord let them hear me! Let just one person care!"
I raised my voice to heaven as the train kept moving on
As we passed behind the church yard I could hear their worship songs
I cried out all the louder to the Christians there inside,
but they raised the chorus louder not hearing me outside
I know they heard the whistle and the clacking of the tracks
They knew that I was going to die and still they turned their backs
I said, "Father in Heaven how can your people be
so very hard of hearing to the cry of one like me?"
I shouted, "Please have mercy! Just a prayer before I die!"
But they sang a little louder to the Holy One on high.
They raised their hands to Heaven but blood was dripping down
The blood of all the innocent their voices tried to drown
They have devotions daily, they function in My name
and they never even realized it was I upon that train.
Penny Lea. 
In our view, individuals who exhibit the least human dignity are
those who compare the Holocaust, the mass murder of 6 million Jews, to
abortion. There exists no comparison more immoral or depraved. It is
both illogical and outrageous to suggest that the calculated murder of
millions of children and adults can be equated with an individual
woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy ...
'Masturbation guru' Sol Gordon.
Why Such Vehemence?
The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid "dens of
crime" that Dickens loved to paint. It is not even done in
concentration camps and labor camps. In those we see its final result.
But it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried and minuted)
by quiet men in clean, carpeted and well-lighted offices, by quiet men
with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do
not need to raise their voices.
C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters.
Sol Gordon is certainly not alone in his condemnation of pro-lifers
for their audacity in comparing the Nazi Holocaust to the New American
Holocausts of abortion, infanticide and euthanasia.
Pro-abortion medical 'ethicist' Dr. Sissela Bok insists that any
comparison between the original and American Holocausts is "an
inflammatory toying with human fears," and British euthanasiast
Glanville Williams calls such comparisons "ridiculous
fantasies" and says that "No proposal for reform, however
strong the argument in its favor, is immune from the 'wedge' objection
[the 'slippery slope']."
It is obvious that a spurious or truly ridiculous comparison
would not receive the dignity or effort of a logical reply. However, if
well-known pro-abortionists feel driven to answer the Holocaust/
abortion analogy with such vehemence, we have some indication that the
analogy is at least partially true, or they wouldn't feel threatened by
Pro-abortionists will scoff, of course, but psychologists know that
the most vicious reactions occur to a statement that comes uncomfortably
close to some secret that a person (or, in this case, persons) want
hidden or obscured.
Abortion pushers passionately loathe the "American
Holocaust" analogy precisely because it is so fitting and because
it hits so very close to home.
Pro-abortion propagandists are very disturbed about this comparison,
and for good reason their thin veil of privacy will be ripped away if
the public sees the pervasive parallels between themselves and the
Nazis, and so they attack the comparison with incredibly vehemence.
The 'abortion mentality' might just as well be called the 'eugenics
mentality;' we, not God, determine who will be born into this (or who
will remain here). This mindset cuts across all borders and issues; it
can be applied to birth control, abortion, sterilization, euthanasia,
and even genocide!
A Detailed Example of Overreaction.
It is very important for pro-life debaters to know exactly why
pro-aborts object so strenuously to the Holocaust comparison. If
pro-abort 'logic' can be effectively debunked, the pro-lifer can show
just how Nazi-like the thinking of the anti-lifers really is in the
The 1990 National Organization for Women fundraising comic book
"Choices" very neatly encapsulated all of the pro-abortion
objections to the "American Holocaust" comparison in a
two-page piece entitled "Donahue."
It seems amusing that pro-abortionists constantly push their
propaganda in comic book form; perhaps they realize that the only people
who will believe their swill are those who operate with a comic-book and
In this story, a woman quotes a Catholic man (with a classic stern,
staring, White 'Big Brother' face), a guest on the "Donahue"
television talk show. Her rebuttal to his statements follows, with
editorial replies to her rhetorical questions added in brackets.
ANALYSIS OF THE "CHOICES" OBJECTION TO THE AMERICAN
Hitler had a conscience, he [the "Donahue" guest] said.
Hitler made a conscious decision to kill Jews. If Hitler had a
Christian conscience, he said, it wouldn't have happened. This guy
kept calling a woman's choice the "Abortion Holocaust." This
pisses me off!
I mean, does this guy really think that a woman's right to decide
for herself can be equated with ovens and gas chambers and medical
experiments?"[The unborn are indeed incinerated in specially-made
Austrian ovens after they are killed. Late-term babies are also the
subjects of ghastly medical experiments, as described in Chapter 73,
Can he actually compare getting on a bus to go to a clinic with
being herded onto trains like cattle (worse than cattle), and being
delivered into the gates of hell, gates with names like Auschwitz,
Dachau, Bergen-Belsen, Treblinka? [Women are herded into clinics by
escorts, rushed through assembly-line abortions, and hustled out the
door as soon as they can stagger a few steps. No time to think it
over, no other options, no informed consent. And the clinics, by
whatever name, are the gates to the tortures of Hell for their
Does he really believe that going through an elective ambulatory
procedure is the same as being strapped down on a table and having
your ovaries irradiated and then removed, without consent, without
anesthesia? [Unborn babies and now, even newborn anencephalic
babies do indeed often have their organs removed without consent and
without anesthesia, just as described in Chapter 73, "Fetal
Jesus Christ! And that's the only Christian thing I can say about
it! How dare he equate the suffering of millions upon millions (and
not only Jews) which was thrust upon them by a madman and his
murdering hordes, with a conscience, Christian or otherwise ... with
personal choice? [Call it anything you want, but the only difference
is this: Instead of having black-garbed SS troops oversee the
execution of millions, now the victim's own mothers willingly carry
them to the slaughter all in the name of 'freedom of choice!']
The final panel shows the woman, with a determined look on her face
vividly reminiscent of a Red Chinese propaganda poster, volunteering
for "Clinic Defense," as she gallantly thinks, "I'm
insulted. No, it's worse. I'm disgusted. As a Jew ... and as a
woman." [We pro-lifers are disgusted, too and that is why we so
adamantly oppose this slaughter of the innocents]!
In summary, the only difference between the Nazi and American
Holocausts is that the ability to make the decision to kill has been
delegated from the Nazi death camp (Vernichtungslager) doctors to
individual women. The main event the killing still takes place.
In fact, it may be said that the American Holocaust is far worse than
the Nazi Holocaust, not only in sheer numbers of deaths, but in the fact
that tens of millions of women have had their consciences deadened to
the point that they want to abort their children for convenience.
At least in the Nazi Holocaust, only a few tens of thousands of men and
women without consciences did the killing.
Notice the tone of the above pro-abortion tirades. These explosions
of incandescent rhetoric illustrate the only two possible pro-abortion
responses to the Holocaust comparison;
(1) Gordon simply states his opinion; as always, there are no
attempts to refute, only to condemn, the Holocaust comparison.
(2) the "Choices" comic-book writer merely asks a long
line of rhetorical questions for the purpose of obscuring the
Notice also that both writers puff up like fat toads with sheer
indignity and bitterness. This is all the pro-abortionists can do. After
all, it is virtually impossible to disprove such a complex
analogy. It is much easier to obscure it with the diversion provided by
an explosion of indignant words.
Pro-lifers have an easy task with the Holocaust parallel; all we have
to do is highlight just a few of the many parallels between the original
and current Holocausts to get our points across. It is up to the
pro-aborts to disprove the analogy, which of course is impossible.
When Pro-Abortion 'Jews' Object.
The Religious Coalition for Abortion Rights shares the outrage of
our member Jewish groups and other member religious bodies over
statements by persons in the anti-choice movement equating the
practice of abortion with the Nazi Holocaust.
Mary Jane Patterson, President, RCAR Board of Directors.
They Do a Good 'Indignant' ...
At no time do Jewish abortophiles become more indignant than when
pro-lifers explain and publicize the many parallels between the original
Nazi Holocaust and the one occurring in the United States right now. The
intensity of their reaction to such analogies is almost comically
When a pro-lifer confronts a 'Jewish' abortophile on the topic of
abortion, the situation can get very sensitive. The 'Jewish' pro-abort
will always fall back from the focus of the debate and will always
accuse the pro-lifer of "anti-Semitism." This reaction is guaranteed,
the 'Jewish' pro-abort simply does not have the imagination to formulate
any other response. The 'Jewish" pro-abort is taking the classic
'victim stance,' and the pro-lifer must not let him get away with it.
The only possible way to deal with this nonsense is with a very
strong counterattack. The pro-lifer should debunk this accusation as
flatly stupid and illogical, and should explain the many parallels
between the Old and New Holocausts. If the situation is particularly
'hot,' the central point can be emphasized again and again: "Who
did all the killing in the first Holocaust? And who does all the killing
There is no way around this parallel for the pro-abort.
The pro-life debater must recognize that real Jews are
pro-life, as explained in Chapter 44. Only Modernist or revisionist
'Jews' are pro-abortion, just as only Modernist or revisionist
'Catholics' are. In other words, people who claim to be both
"pro-choice" and "Jewish" are really not Jewish at
Revisionist 'Jews' As Bigots.
Strangely, the same people who snivel about "religious
bigotry" are usually virulent anti-Christian bigots themselves.
More particularly, most pro-abortion 'Jews' seem to have a strong
anti-Catholic bias that they do not even seem to be aware of.
For example, 'Jewish' abortophile Regina Barshak squawked loudly when
pro-lifers dared to draw the Old/New Holocaust analogy in her presence;
"For the purposes of this political campaign, they [pro-lifers]
help themselves at the expense of cheapening the memory of those
millions of murdered men, women and children, as well as at the expense
of the personal distress caused by an apparently disrespectful use of
events ... It must be noted that while millions of men, women and
children relentlessly dragged themselves to their death under the boots
of their tormentors for nearly a decade, neither the voices of the
prestigious leaders of the Vatican nor the voices of "Value of
Life" persons were heard on behalf of these tortured lives. Now
this world drama is exploited in the form of a callous and cheap and
convenient cliche for the self-serving purposes of a political
The Real Scoop on the Vatican.
Not only is Barshak's knowledge of history abysmal, but her
transparent anti-Catholic bigotry clearly shows through. Prominent
Jewish leaders have acknowledged the actions of the Vatican and of
various Fundamentalist churches in saving the lives of tens of thousands
of Jews during World War II.
During the War, Pope Pius XII authorized the issuing of more than
10,000 Vatican ration tickets, identity cards, and other papal documents
to refugees at great risk to both himself and the Vatican. The Vatican's
Crusade of Charity directly assisted more than 695,000 victims of the
war, including a large percentage of Jews.
Pope Pius XI even issued an encyclical condemning Nazism on Palm
Sunday of 1937 entitled Mit Brennender Sorg ("With Burning
Anxiety"). The document, which referred to Hitler by name as
"a mad prophet possessed of repulsive arrogance," was smuggled
into Germany, where it was read by all of the German Bishops from their
The Nazi national newspaper Volkischer Beobachter viciously
attacked Pius, characterizing him as "the Jew-god in Rome."
Himmler's deputy, Paul Heydrich, commented that "The Pope has
repudiated the National Socialist New European Order ... He is virtually
accusing the German people of injustice toward the Jews and makes
himself the mouthpiece of the Jewish war criminals."
The Pope saved the lives of hundreds of Jews by paying to the Nazis a
ransom of one hundred pounds of gold, obtained by melting down religious
vessels. And the Pope and his officials established 180 places of refuge
within the cramped confines of the Vatican, which sheltered more than
five thousand Jews during the Nazi occupation of Rome.
On Christmas Day of 1942, a New York Times editorial praised
the Pope as "a lonely voice crying out of the silence of a
The Chief Rabbi of Rome, Israel Zolli, and his wife became Catholic
in 1945 and took the baptismal name Eugenio, the given name of Pope Pius
XII. The Rabbi, who had offered himself as hostage for his fellow Jews
during the War, was declared dead by his former synagogue and declared
several days' fast in atonement for his conversion.
Additionally, at least a dozen Catholic priests are honored as
"Righteous Gentiles" with trees planted along the Avenue of
the Just at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem.
When Pius XII died in 1958, Israeli Foreign Minister Golda Meir
declared that "When fearful martyrdom came to our people in the
decade of Nazi terror, the voice of the Pope was raised for the
victims." Israeli official Pinchas E. Lapide wrote in 1967 that the
Catholic Church saved anywhere from 700,000 to 860,000 Jews during the
But these historical facts mean nothing to common bigots like Barshak,
who will slavishly ignore all evidence in their almost pathological
desire to condemn the Catholic Church, which remains the single greatest
obstacle to their treasured goal of free and easy abortion on demand.
Barshak and her repulsive ilk simply base their bigotry upon the
opinions of other bigots, the first of whom was Rolf Hochhuch.
Pope Pius XII died in 1958. Just five years later (now that he was
unable to defend himself), anti-Catholics launched their flood of
backstabbing criticisms and slander with an undistinguished Berlin play
in February of 1963. The heretofore-unknown German playwright Rolf
Hochhuch produced Der Stellvertreter ("The Deputy"),
which, among other things, alleged that Pius XII was a "war
criminal" because he was "totally silent" on the question
of Jewish extermination; that he actually approved of and assisted the
Nazi regime in many ways; and that he urged the United States to join
Hitler in attacking the Soviet Union in 1945.
Inconsistency and Hypocrisy.
Notice how pro-aborts like to have it both ways; when pro-lifers
enter the political arena, abortophiles snivel that they are trying to
impose a "profoundly religious" viewpoint on everyone and
then, when pro-lifers try to become involved in church activities, the
abortion issue suddenly becomes a "political campaign," as
Pro-lifers should not be misled by the agonized bleating of 'Jews'
who are aggressively promoting abortion. For these people, preserving
their precious abortion 'right' is infinitely more important than
honoring the memory of the victims of the original Holocaust.
The Dangers of the
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a
human face forever!
George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Perhaps the one aspect of the new and old Holocausts that disturbs
pro-abortionists the most is pro-life insistence upon the existence of
the looming "slippery slope."
If the public finally realizes that abortion inevitably leads to
euthanasia (and therefore poses a direct and clear threat to them),
the anti-life agenda will be exposed. The pro-abortionists know that the
spurious "right to privacy" on a national scale is the only
thing that can preserve their "progress" down the slippery
slope. They will do anything to maintain this strategic veil of secrecy.
Incrementalism is the Key.
The Nazis skidded down the "slippery slope" with incredible
speed, traversing the complete range from eugenic sterilization to
genocide in only nine years. They violated the principle of
incrementalism (gradualism), which states that social change must occur
at a rate that is virtually unnoticeable to the public. If change
proceeds too quickly or in steps that are too large, the movement will
be vigorously opposed. We 'modern' people are following the same road,
albeit at a more careful and leisurely pace. We are paying attention to
the principle of incrementalism.
After reviewing the medical war crimes trials at Nuremberg, the World
Medical Association (WMA) adopted the Declaration of Geneva in 1948.
This document read, in part; "I will maintain the utmost respect
for human life, from the time of conception; even under threat, I will
not use my medical knowledge contrary to the laws of humanity."
With Nazi atrocities still vividly in mind, researchers and
physicians generally held to the Declaration of Geneva, and to the more
comprehensive Hippocratic Oath, for about two decades after World War II
The Wall is Doomed.
But then cracks began to appear in the armor of the physician's
regard for human life. Once again, the eugenicist/utilitarian mindset
began to appear in isolated instances. And, as we all know after being
taught the lesson twice, after the first crack appears, the wall is
Two famous physicians/researchers injected live cancer cells into
elderly patients at Brooklyn's Jewish Hospital and Medical Center in the
mid-1960s. In the first publicized case of infanticide, doctors at Johns
Hopkins Medical Center allowed a baby boy with Down Syndrome to starve
to death in 1971.
Soon thereafter, the United States Supreme Court bestowed upon us
abortion on demand throughout the entire nine months of pregnancy. In
1983, Baby Doe of Bloomington, Indiana was starved to death. Although an
estimated 2,000 infanticides had been occurring in this country every
year, what made this case significant was that it was the first court-sanctioned
instance of euthanasia in this country (for further information on the
history of the euthanasia movement in the United States, see Chapter 110
in Volume III).
It was not long before late-term aborted babies became prey to
experimentation while they were still alive and feeling pain, as
condoned by two leading medical researchers; "Since we know we are
going to destroy, dismember and discard the fetus in a procedure known
as abortion, it seems a small indignity to expose it to rubella vaccine
just prior to that termination. The medical ethic 'do no harm' would, of
course, be violated but we have already violated that principle when we
accepted the concept of abortion. The ultimate harm of destroying the
fetus trivializes that which precedes it."
Compare this statement to the one made by Nazi Dr. Julius
Hallervorden, quoted at the Nuremberg trials in 1945: "If you are
going to kill all these people, at least take the brains out so that the
material may be utilized."
The Similarities Between
the Nazi and American Holocausts.
Nazism is merely applied biology.
The proof (or rebuttal) of any comparison is found primarily not in
the differences between two or more entities or ideas, but in the
The similarities between the Nazi and American Holocausts are simply
too profound and numerous to ignore. They include;
(1) the identical country of origin;
(2) the identical pervasive use of propaganda and deceptive
(3) the identical justification of the atrocities;
(4) early medical leadership of the Holocausts;
(5) dehumanization of the victims; and
(6) the identical anti-life, Hegelian philosophy of those in power.
These similarities are not trivial or 'fringe' in nature; they
address the very heart of the matter. The philosophies and the
methods employed by both the Nazis and the pro-abortionists are
These similarities are discussed in the following paragraphs.
Similarity (1): Country of
The United States Leads the Way. It may be almost incomprehensible to
the close-minded and those who would like to avoid shame by rewriting
history, but the philosophy of the Nazi eugenics movement was not framed
and nourished in Germany.
It was conceived, developed and nurtured in our own "land of the
free" the United States!
Statements of the Eugenicists.
The proof is in the statements made by leading American eugenicists,
racists, and euthanasiasts during the period from the mid-1920s to the
mid-1930s, when their movements flourished.
Several years before the Third Reich was founded (i.e., in the mid-1920s),
Hitler and his cronies were avid readers of American eugenicists,
including especially the pathologically anti-Semitic Madison Grant.
Grant argued that "sentimental beliefs" (such as
Christianity) short-circuited the practice of infanticide, which he saw
as a natural weeding-out process necessary to the preservation of the
Grant and Dr. Lothrop Stoddard exerted great influence "... in
awakening in Germany ... the movement for the preservation and increase
of the Nordic race." Stoddard asserted that compulsory
sterilization of the "unfit" was a "gift" from the
American eugenics movement.
It is interesting that the masthead slogan of the Birth Control
Review was "Creating a Race of Thoroughbreds." In 1933,
the magazine featured an article entitled "Eugenic Sterilization:
An Urgent Need," authored by Adolf Hitler's Director of Genetic
Sterilization and founder of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene Ernst
Lothrop Stoddard sat on the board of the American Birth Control
League (later Planned Parenthood) in the 1930s. The Birth Control
Review enthusiastically endorsed his book The Rising Tide of
Color Against White World-Supremacy. In this book (introduced by
fellow racist/eugenicist Madison Grant), Stoddard demonstrates beyond a
shadow of reasonable doubt the intimate connections between abortion,
eugenics and goal-oriented racism, both in the Nazi regime and in
... upon the quality of human life all else depends ... none of the
colored races shows perceptible signs of declining birth-rate, all
tending to breed up to the limits of available subsistence ... It can
mean only one thing: a tremendous and steadily augmenting outward
thrust of surplus colored men from overcrowded colored homelands ...
But many of these relatively empty [Northern] lands have been
definitely set aside by the white man as his own special heritage ...
His ["colored" man's] outstanding quality is
superabundant animal vitality. In this he easily surpasses all other
races. To it he owes his intense emotionalism. To it, again, is due
his extreme fecundity, the negro being the quickest of breeders. This
abounding vitality shows in many other ways, such as the negro's
ability to survive harsh conditions of slavery under which other races
have soon succumbed ... black blood, once entering a human stock,
seems never really bred out again ...
White men cannot, under peril of their vary race-existence, allow
wholesale Asian immigration into white race-areas ... The grim truth
of the matter is this: The whole white race is exposed, immediately or
ultimately, to the possibility of social sterilization and final
replacement or absorption by the teeming colored races.
And, of course, the more primitive a type is, the more prepotent it
is. This is why crossings with the negro are uniformly fatal. Whites,
Amerindians, or Asiatics all are alike vanquished by the invincible
prepotency of the more primitive, generalized, and lower negro blood.
... whether we consider interwhite migrations or colored
encroachments on white lands, the net result is an expansion of lower
and a contraction of higher stocks, the process being thus a disgenic
For race-betterment is such an intensely practical matter! When
peoples come to realize that the quality of the population is the
source of all their prosperity, progress, security, and even
existence; we shall see much-abused "eugenics" actually
moulding social programmes and political policies ... we or the next
generation will take in hand the problem of race-depreciation, and
segregation of defectives and abolition of handicaps penalizing the
better stocks will put an end to our present racial decline.
Notice how, near the end of the second paragraph, Stoddard lets slip
that he does not consider Blacks to be human. Does this sound familiar?
Remember that Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, heartily
approved of the book's contents.
Notice also how Stoddard waxes prophetic in the last paragraph. His
prophecy, unfortunately, has turned to fact. It is our benighted
generation that has taken up the task of "abolishing
handicaps" and dealing with "race-depreciation" by
employing the devastatingly effective weapon of racially-directed
H.L. Mencken, another leading American eugenicist, urged that "A
resolute attack be made on the fecundity of all the males on the lowest
rung of the social ladder."
Yet another American eugenicist demanded that Hitler be "...
made an honorary member of the [American] Eugenics Record
James Davenport grumbled that "Our ancestors drove Baptists from
Massachusetts Bay into Rhode Island, but we have no place to drive the
Jews to. Also, they burned the witches, but it seems to be against the
mores to burn any considerable part of our population."
The Courts Go Along.
With so many leading American thinkers advocating such a fashionable,
utilitarian, and 'socially beneficial' course of action, is it any
surprise that their depraved fantasies were placed into concrete action,
despite Constitutional safeguards?
The United States court system bestowed its imprimatur upon
eugenics in 1927, when Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote
the majority opinion in the Court's Buck v. Bell decision
upholding the enforced eugenic sterilization of poor Black women. Holmes
held that; "We have seen more than once that the public welfare may
call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it
could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for
these lesser sacrifices ... Three generations of imbeciles are
This eugenic sterilization law was reversed by the Supreme Court only
as recently as 1972. But the damage had been done. Following the lead of
the Supreme Court, thirty states had enacted laws that mandated
sterilization for the poor by 1933.
These laws followed the Model Eugenical Sterilization Law,
promulgated by Harry H. Laughlin, director of the Eugenics Record
Office. They called for the sterilization of criminals, mental patients,
the retarded, the blind, deaf, diseased, and alcoholics, and for
dependents upon society: the homeless, orphans, and tramps.
From 1924 to the early 1970s, more than 7,500 poor men and women were
forcibly sterilized in the State of Virginia alone. Of course, these
operations were performed in approved "mental health
facilities" on "unwed mothers, prostitutes, petty criminals
and children with disciplinary problems."
Other laws drafted by American eugenicists mandated segregation of
those with birth defects and mental disabilities in state-run
institutions. No inmate ever left these places with their reproductive
organs intact they were all neutered like stray dogs. In some states,
all of those inmates who carried hereditary disabilities were
sterilized. Other state regulations mandated contraceptive use by all
whose family history indicated a predisposition towards serious
Resurrection of the Horror.
A person with common sense might think that this type of thinking
would die out after the eugenics-driven horrors of World War II.
Unfortunately, those who long for a better world right now always
desire it at the expense of those they consider inferior to themselves,
as shown by the quotes in Figure 53-1.
QUOTES BY AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN EUGENICISTS
[We have a choice of] a painless weeding out before birth or a more
painful and wasteful elimination of individuals [with low IQ] after
Garrett Hardin. Biology: Its Human Implications (1949).
Do our nobly intended welfare programs promote dysgenics
retrogressive evolution through the disproportionate reproduction of
the genetically disadvantaged?
Nobel Prize winner William Shockley Chase,
quoted in Mark Haller's Eugenics (New Jersey: Rutgers University
Press), 1963, page 482.
We civilized men do our utmost to check the process of elimination;
we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we
institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to
save the live of every one to the last moment ... Thus the weak
members of civilized societies propagate their kind. No one who has
attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must
be highly injurious to the race of man.
Charles Darwin, quoted in Mark Haller's Eugenics
(New Jersey: Rutgers University Press), 1963, p. 4.
Society as the trustee of life is responsible to life for every
botched life that comes into existence; and as it has to atone for
such lives, it ought consequently to make it impossible for them ever
to see the light of day: it should in many cases actually prevent the
act of procreation, and may, without any regard for rank, descent, or
intellect, hold in readiness the most rigorous forms of compulsion and
restriction, and, under certain circumstances, have recourse to
castration ... "Thou shalt do no murder," is a piece of
ingenuous puerility compared with "Thou shalt not beget" !!!
... The [unhealthy] must at all costs be eliminated, lest the whole
fall to pieces.
Friedreich Nietzsche, quoted in Mark
Haller's Eugenics (New Jersey: Rutgers Press), 1963, page 53.
No training or education can create intelligence; you must breed
British scientist Karl Pierson, Huxley
Lectures, quoted in Daniel Kelves' In the Name of Eugenics (New
York: Knopf), page 3.
The social imperialist state might well have to intervene in
reproductive matters, at least in the families of anti-social
propagators of unnecessary human beings.
British scientist Karl Pierson, quoted in
Daniel Kelves' In the Name of Eugenics (New York: Knopf), p. 34.
There is now no reasonable excuse for refusing to face the fact
that nothing but a eugenics religion can save our civilization from
the fate that has overtaken all previous civilizations.
George Bernard Shaw, quoted in Mark Haller's
Eugenics (New Jersey: Rutgers Press), 1963, page 19.
Double Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling has suggested that those who
carry "dysfunctional genes" have such information tattooed
onto their foreheads.
Linus Pauling. Foreword to "Reflections on the New
Biology." UCLA Law Review, Feb. 1968, page 269.
Biologist John Maynard Smith would like to give tax breaks and
bonuses to the educated and intelligent who have children and heavily
John Maynard Smith. "Eugenics and Utopia." Daedalus,
Summer 1989, page 91.
When it comes to feelings, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy. They
are all mammals. They all feel pain. There is no rational basis for
saying that a human being has special rights ... 6 million people died
in concentration camps, but 6 billion chickens will die this year in
Ingrid Newkirk, founder and director of
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), quoted by syndicated
columnist Stephen Chapman in the December 6, 1989 Chicago Tribune.
The last quote by animal rights activist Ingrid Newkirk in this table
is doubly amusing, not only because of its inherent outrageously
illogical nature, but also because of the fact that Sol Gordon and other
pro-abortionists who rail against the comparison between the Nazi and
American Holocausts don't seem to mind Jews being compared to feedlot
There is ample evidence that the Nazi "quality of life"
ethic not only survives to this day, it flourishes and receives
wide acceptance and applause. This phenomenon is particularly evident
when addressing abortion and sterilization.
Dr. H.G. Whittington unconsciously betrayed the Holocaust-abortion
connection when he wrote that "The [abortion] counselor must help
the applicant [for abortion] face a painful existential dilemma: whether
to kill one nascent human being in order to enhance the quality of life
of another person ... Society legalizes abortion to enhance the quality
of human life." Just as the Nazis exterminated the Jews to
enhance their 'quality of human life' and Lebensraum.
This utilitarian, anti-life attitude even extends to minorities, who
should know far better than the rest of us what oppression is, and who
should know the true value of human life. For example, as a
"somewhat chilling surprise" to the researchers who did a
survey of Black health workers and opinion leaders, 73 percent of those
polled approved of the involuntary sterilization of mentally
handicapped and mentally ill women.
Similarity (2): Use of
Neither American nor German history justifies the leap from that
proposition [that legalizing abortion is to legalize murder] to the
view that Americans reason like Nazis and have "simply declared
the unborn to be nonhuman."
"Of Analogy and Abortion." The
New York Times, March 15, 1984.
The Purposes of Newspeak.
Both the National Socialist (Nazi) movement and the pro-abortion
movement use nice-sounding words to salve the consciences of their
Despite luxuriant growths of Newspeak, the average German knew
precisely what was going on. And so does the average American. But the
average German was afraid to take action. And so is the average
American. Ditto for the churches. The public and the churches, just as
much as the actual killers, use these terms to give themselves an excuse
not to stop the killing. The average do-nothing
"Christian" uses these words when he talks about abortion and
infanticide with other average do-nothing "Christians."
Examples of Newspeak.
Notably, both the Nazis and the American pro-abortion movement
habitually use inflammatory Newspeak as propaganda for the purpose of
degrading and dehumanizing both their victims and their opposition.
Tens of thousands of Jewish, Gypsy, and handicapped children were
killed by the "Reich Committee for Children." Those sickly
persons who would be eliminated were identified by the grandly-named
"Committee for Research on Hereditary Diseases and Constitutional
Susceptibility to Severe Diseases." These unfortunate people were
carried to concentration camps by the "Non-Profit Patient Transport
Corporation," and their passage was funded by the "Charitable
Foundation for Institutional Care."
The Nazis used a vast galaxy of terms when referring to the
extermination of the Jews; "resettlement,"
"evacuation," "clearing the area of Jews,"
"cleansing," "disinfection," "special
treatment," "moving off to labor in the East,"
"injecting off," "putting to sleep like animals,"
"discharging," "cleaning-up of the Jewish question,"
and "the final solution to the Jewish question" are just a few
of the euphemisms they employed.
The words employed by the Nazis and the pro-abortionists to label the
essential elements of their respective Holocausts the victims, the
killing, the killers, the killing places, and the opposition are shown
in Figure 53-2. The similarities are absolutely striking.
NEWSPEAK EMPLOYED BY THE NAZI AND PRO-ABORTION MOVEMENTS
NEWSPEAK APPLIED TO THE JEWS
Ballastexistenzen human ballast
"Garbage" Dr. Christian Wirth
Sheise (shit) Hermann Goebbels
"Live devoid of meaning and value"
"Empty shells of human beings"
"Human weeds" Hermann Goebbels
"An infection" A. Hitler
NEWSPEAK APPLIED TO THE PREBORN
"Just like fingernail clippings or warts"
Products of conception, contents of the uterus
Abortus, conceptus, gobbet of meat
Blob of tissue, parasite, leech
Mass of protoplasm
Pregnancy is a venereal disease
NEWSPEAK APPLIED TO THE NAZI PHYSICIANS
Ordinary mainstream citizens
Heroes of the Aryan Race
Builders of a new social order
NEWSPEAK APPLIED TO AMERICAN ABORTIONISTS
Ordinary mainstream citizens
Woman's choice physicians
Champions of women's choice
"Providers" of a social good
NEWSPEAK APPLIED TO THE MASS MURDER OF THE JEWS
Improvement of the Aryan Race
Evacuating the afflicted/infested (urban) area
Removal of undesirable social elements
Adjustment of the social order
NEWSPEAK APPLIED TO THE MASS MURDER OF THE PREBORN
Improvement of women's health
Evacuating the afflicted/infested (uterine) area
Interruption/termination of pregnancy
Postconception fertility interruption
Venereal disease treatment
Retrospective fertility control
NEWSPEAK APPLIED TO THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS
NEWSPEAK APPLIED TO THE ABORTION CLINICS
Women's care centers
Reproductive health center
NEWSPEAK APPLIED TO GERMAN CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS
Enemies of the Aryan Race
Small and vocal minority
NEWSPEAK APPLIED TO PRO-LIFE ACTIVISTS
Enemies of women (misogynists)
Small and vocal minority
Ayatollah Khomeini clones (abortionist Bill Baird)
Drooling androids (abortion lawyer Ed Tiryak)
Just "Ordinary Men" ...
And so, after a dozen years of this kind of soothing and reassuring
propaganda in Germany, the Nazis recruited 3,000 ordinary men from all
walks of life in the Spring of 1941 for a "special
After several months of training, these 3,000 men were organized into
four special-purpose battalions (Ersatzgruppen) and given their
assignment: To roam the vast reaches of Eastern Europe and ruthlessly
exterminate all of the Jews and Gypsies they found.
Within nine months, these 3,000 men had killed 1.5 million men, women
and children an average of 500 murders per man! Some of the killers were
sickened at first, but soon grew used to the ceaseless slaughter. For
month after month, they killed 8,000 people per day (they got weekends
off), and their leaders who were specially trained and instructed to
watch for psychological impacts among the men reported almost none.
After the war, hundreds of these men underwent intensive and detailed
psychological tests on the belief that they were psychopaths
specifically recruited by the Nazis for their genocidal task. But the Summary
Report found that there were no more psychological anomalies in this
group than in the general population. The only characteristic common to
all of them was that they were all completely desensitized to violence
In other words, they were just ordinary Germans. They were, in a
word, just like ordinary Americans.
Most of the Nazi killers of the World War II concentration camps were
also perfectly ordinary human beings, as described in Christopher
Browning's book Ordinary Men (Harper-Collins, 1992). Browning
describes the activities of a military reserve unit, the 101st Police
Battalion, which was comprised entirely of Bremerhaven steelworkers.
It was the job of these men to "process" new arrivals at
the Polish concentration camps, including Auschwitz. When trainloads of
Jews and other "undesirables" would arrive at the camps, the
steelworkers would first separate small children from their mothers.
Then they would slaughter the mothers. And then they killed the little
children with clear consciences, since, without mothers, their
"quality of life" (Lebensqualitat) would be too
And so, the members of this unit which consisted entirely of
perfectly ordinary people slaughtered thousands of little two- and
three-year old girls and boys, and claimed at the Nuremburg trials that
they were merely participating in "acts of mercy."
A Bogus Comparison?
Pro-abortionists (especially 'Jewish' pro-aborts) will scoff at the
idea that Americans have been desensitized to violence. They will simply
claim that no rogue battalions wander the countryside slaughtering
millions in the United States.
What is the truth? Have Americans been desensitized to violence
towards the preborn or have they not?
Pro-aborts are not really raving demons, although they may appear to
be at times. They are perfectly ordinary human beings just like you and
me who just happen to have bought into the deadly "quality of
Today, abortion clinic workers echo the same words used by the
Bremerhaven steelworkers as they fruitlessly tried to defend themselves
against charges of mass murder and genocide at the Nuremburg trials.
Many abortuary staff have candidly admitted that, if it were legal to
kill perfectly healthy four- and five-year old boys and girls in
clinics, they would gladly help.
A typical interview;
Question: "Oh, so as long as you make money, it doesn't
Clinic Employee: "As long as it's food in my stomach, no, it
doesn't matter. It is legal ... It is legal ... It is legal!"
Question: "So if they legalized killing four-year-old
children, you would have no problem?"
Clinic Employee: "No, I would not have a problem ... My
conscience is very clear ..."
If this is not a classic example of desensitization, what is?
If we have not been desensitized, why do late-term abortionists
describe the process of desensitization in precisely the same words that
the German "ordinary men" did: "You have to become a bit
schizophrenic. In one room you encourage the patient that the slight
irregularity of the fetal heart is not important, everything is going
well, she is going to have a nice baby, and then you shut the door and
go into the next room and assure another patient on whom you just did a
saline abortion that it's fine if the heart is already irregular, she
has nothing to worry about, she is not going to have a live baby. I mean
you definitely have to make a 180-degree turn, but somehow it evolved in
my own mind gradually, and I have no trouble now making the switch
If we have not become desensitized, how can abortionist Warren Hern
calmly and dispassionately describe the dismembering of a two-or three
pound viable baby like this: "We have reached a point in this
particular technology where there is no possibility of denial of an act
of destruction on the part of the operator. It is before one's eyes. The
sensations of dismemberment flow through the forceps like an electric
current ... The procedure changes significantly at 21 weeks because the
fetal tissues become much more cohesive and difficult to dismember ... A
long curved Mayo scissors may be necessary to decapitate and dismember
If we are not desensitized, how can another late-term abortionist
compare pulling apart viable babies "like chickens?":
"It's difficult to pull apart a chicken when it is newly killed.
You have to cook it first, and then it comes apart very easily. It's the
same here [when doing a late-term abortion]."
And how can a nurse sound almost joyous at the prospect of assisting
at late-term prostaglandin abortions: "It's a really interesting
thing that is happening. It's fascinating, when you can think about it
clinically and not get involved in the babies, or the people ... Several
times I saw really beautiful things happen, I mean it's physically
beautiful. Sometimes you can see the vagina opening up and the entire
thing coming out at once ... It's a really interesting thing, and it got
me very excited."
Finally, how can we compare living unborn babies to warts if we have
not become desensitized to the unceasing slaughter that is happening in
our own communities right now: "For the most part it [fetal
remains] is thrown out like in many doctors' offices. If you had a wart
removed or whatever (chuckle) you could make that analogy."
Most appalling and frightening of all, how can the majority of the
American public believe that abortion is the killing of a living human
being yet still want to keep the procedure "safe and legal" if
it has not been profoundly desensitized?
Similarity (3): Justifying
The perpetrators of any oppression must rationalize their actions for
two reasons: (1) to try to fool the public, and (2) to try to fool
The greater the offense against humanity, the more aggressive the
propaganda and the deeper the self-deception.
Unlike the Nazi Holocaust, the American Holocaust has had millions of
perpetrators, some ignorant of, and some in complete command of, the
facts. The most pervasive and deceptive propaganda is directed towards
the perpetrators of the American Holocaust those women who have had or
are about to have abortions.
Figure 53-3 shows some of these self-excusing rationalizations.
Notice the heavy dependence on the idea that "if it's legal,
it's right." Notice also that physicians are not killers,
just "instruments," as if they were dull and simple tools
without judgment, morals, or discernment. Finally, notice that the
appeals to the public are framed in terms of "the common
JUSTIFYING, RATIONALIZING, AND EXCUSING THE HOLOCAUSTS
[A medium text size on your computer's 'view'
setting is recommended, otherwise, the tables may be discombobulated.]
"The accused did
"I did nothing which was
act wrongly because
illegal, immoral, or bad
were covered by the
medicine. Everything I did
and were carrying out
was in accordance with the law."
laws of the
Boston abortionist Kenneth
Edelin, at his manslaughter
trial for strangling to
death a live late-term
aborted baby girl in 1975.
"The courts tell
"I just go by what the court
that this is a legal
says. I only do what's legal."
it is all quite legal."
Abortionist M. Jackson,
New York City.
Walter E. Schmidt.
"The physician is
"The physician is only the
an instrument, as in the
instrument of her decision."
of an officer who receives an
Dr. Karl Brandt, Nuremberg
Doctor Trial, 1947.
"The victims of
"In the case of abortion,
Buchenwald typhus test
the fetus is doomed to death
not suffer in vain and
anyhow, but perhaps its death
not die in vain.
can be ennobled when the
were saved by
research has as its objec-
tive the saving of the lives of
other wanted fetuses."
Dr. Gebhard Rose, Nurem-
berg Doctor Trial,
Drs. Willard Gaylin
and Mark Lappe, 1975.
"What good does it do
"Most birth defects are not
humanity to maintain arti-
discovered until birth. If a
ficially and rear
child were not declared alive until
thousands of cripples,
three days after birth, the doctor
mutes, and idiots? Is it
could allow the child to die if the
better and more rational to
parents so choose and save a lot of
off from the first
misery and suffering. I believe
unavoidable misery which
this view is the only rational,
poor lives will bring
compassionate attitude to have."
themselves and their families?"
Nobel laureate Dr. James D.
Dr. Ernst Haeckel,
and biological scientist,
The governments of various
government ordered 2,000
cities, including Atlanta, Pitts-
police to ensure that "demon-
burgh, New York, San Francisco,
strators" did not disturb
and many others turn out swarms
"peace and order" while
of riot-helmeted police to ensure
of Jewish children were
that "demonstrators" do not disturb
up and crammed into busses
public "peace and order" while
transport to extermination
hundreds of American preborn
in the Summer of
children are exterminated.
Reference: Most of these quotes may be found
in William Brennan. The Abortion Holocaust: Today's Final Solution.
Order from Landmark Press, Post Office Box 13547, 1461 Dunn Road, St.
Louis, Missouri 63138, or Life Issues Bookshelf, Sun Life, Thaxton,
Virginia 24174, telephone: (703) 586-4898. 1983, 237 pages.
Similarity (4): Medical
Physicians not black-clad Schutzstaffel thugs developed the
philosophy and methodology of the Nazi Holocaust. Almost all of the
leading German, British, and American eugenicists admired by the leaders
of the Third Reich were doctors.
The American Holocaust was initiated by Neofeminists and
opportunistic politicians, but physicians soon took over the
pro-abortion movement's leadership. Warren Hern, Bill Baird, Bernard
Nathanson, Henry Morgentaler, Willard Cates, Alan Guttmacher, and many
other pro-abortion strategists and leaders were physicians.
Figure 53-4 shows the similarities between the thinking of the German
and American doctors.
The attitude that is most striking is the bare, stark utilitarianism
shown by these so-called Nazi and pro-abortion 'physicians.' Placed in a
position where they could literally dictate life or death with impunity,
they soon reverted to relying upon their own instincts for guidance
instead of a truly caring, God-inspired set of immutable rules.
What we must remember is that the anti-life mentality is purely
utilitarian. Anything (or anyone) that is inconvenient or useless must
be eliminated. This viewpoint originated in Hitler's Hegelian ethic, as
described in his work Mein Kampf; "Everything must be
examined from this [utilitarian] point of view and used or rejected
according to its utility."
Once again, situation ethics reign supreme in the United States, just
as they did in Nazi Germany a half-century ago.
MEDICAL LEADERSHIP IN THE HOLOCAUSTS
"The destruction of
"Abortion is precisely equivalent
is analogous to removing a
to operating on an appendix or
gangrenous appendix from a
removing a gangrenous bowel."
Dr. Alan Guttmacher,
Nazi doctor Fritz Klein.
"A doctor may interrupt a
"A licensed physician is
pregnancy when it threatens the
justified in terminating a pregnancy
life or the health of the mother.
if he believes that the pregnancy
An unborn child that is likely
would impair the physical/mental
to present hereditary and
health of the mother or that the
transmissible defects may be
child would be born with grave
physical or mental defect."
German Penal Code and
American Law Institute
Hamburg Eugenics Court,
Model Penal Code, 1962.
"The authority of physicians
is enlarged to include the respon-
in all its aspects is inherently
sibility for according a "mercy
and primarily a medical decision
death" to "incurables.""
and basic responsibility
Hitler's Euthanasia Order,
must rest with the physician."
Roe v. Wade, 1973.
"If you are going to kill
"With changes in the abortion
all these people, at least take
laws, fetuses as valuable research
the brains out so that the
material is on the increase."
material may be utilized."
Dr. Leroy Jackson, 1975.
Dr. Julius Hallervorden,
Nuremberg trials, 1945.
Reference: Most of these quotes may be found in William Brennan. The
Abortion Holocaust: Today's Final Solution. Order from Landmark
Press, Post Office Box 13547, 1461 Dunn Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63138,
or Life Issues Bookshelf, Sun Life, Thaxton, Virginia 24174, telephone:
(703) 586-4898. 1983, 237 pages.
Similarity (5): Dehumanization of the Victim.
Those who use this [Holocaust] analogy maintain that the
proponents of freedom of choice have dehumanized the unborn child, just
as the Nazis dehumanized the Jew. This is not true.
'Rabbi' Charles D. Mintz, writing for the 'Religious' Coalition for
Abortion Rights (RCAR).
It is so much easier to eliminate a class of people who have
first been carefully stripped of their human dignity. This has happened
so many times that we have lost count. Yet we still refuse to learn our
lessons from history.
The same Neofeminists who call the unborn "protoplasmic
rubbish," "gobbets of meat," "parasites," and
"blobs" fume about how women were historically oppressed and
'kept down' by men who viewed them as 'weaker vessels' with no talents
other than having and raising babies.
Black 'leaders' like Jesse Jackson and Coretta Scott King, who refer
to the unborn as "products of conception" or "contents of
the uterus," snivel about the injustices that White men heaped on
Blacks more than a century ago, robbing them of their humanity by
calling them "brutes, obscene with animal appetites, vicious, and
illegitimate," and "ignorant, perverse, wicked, the pest of
White men, agents of Satan."
According to the Nazis, Jews and others not of Aryan quality
"... had to be treated like tuberculosis bacilli, with which a
healthy body may become infested. This was not cruel, if one remembers
that even innocent creatures of nature, such as hares and deer, have to
be killed, so that no harm is caused by them."
Adolf Hitler, in his book Mein Kampf ("My
Struggle"), variously referred to Jews as "maggots in a
rotting corpse;" "a plague worse than the Black Death;"
"mankind's eternal germ of disunion;" "drones in the
human hive;" "spiders sucking blood out of the people's
pores;" "a pack of rats eating one another;" "the
eternal bloodsucker;" "the vampire of peoples;" and
"a harmful bacillus that spreads," among many other degrading
Figure 53-5 shows the striking sameness of the language of
dehumanization. Acts of genocide are invariably cloaked with words of
kindness and compassion; "empty," "removal,"
"evacuation," and "treatment," to name just a few.
The perpetrators, instead of being truthfully portrayed as the killers
they really are, wear the thick and nearly impenetrable cloak of
respectability, and anyone who dares question it is ruthlessly
DEHUMANIZATION OF THE VICTIMS OF THE HOLOCAUSTS
"It had nothing to do with
"What is aborted is a
humanity. It was a mass. I
protoplasmic mass and not
rarely saw them as individuals,
a real live individual."
always a huge mass."
Dr. Walter Char and
Franz Stangle, Treblinka
Dr. John McDermott, 1972.
Commandant, 1971 trial.
"If it is pointed out that
"It is a wild contention that
the Jew is human, I then reject
newborn babies are persons."
Dr. Michael Tooley, 1972.
Reichstag speech, 1895.
"Whenever Jews are left to
"A parasite can commit
themselves, they bring brutal
murder. What attention has
misery and depravity. They
Catholic thinking or the law
are pure parasites."
given to the fetus's capacity
Reichsfuhrer A. Hitler, 1943.
to murder its mother?"
Dr. Natalie Shalness, 1968.
"For the first four and
Commissars personify a
one-half months, the fetus is
repulsive yet characteristic
subhuman and relatively close
to a piece of tissue."
Dr. August Hirt, 1942.
Amital Etzioni, Ph.D., 1976.
"Only persons of German or
"The word 'person' as used
related blood can be citizens;
in the Fourteenth Amendment does
this does not include Jews."
not include the unborn."
Reich Citizenship Law 410,2, 1934.
Roe v. Wade, 1973.
"59,000 persons were
"The uterus was evacuated."
Abortionist David Edelman, 1974.
SS Report on the Warsaw
Ghetto, June 1942.
"The Baron de Hirsch ghetto
"The uterine cavity was
would have to be emptied."
Abortionist A.K. Mukerjee, 1973.
Max Merten, 1943.
"... the removal of the
"... remove the products of
Abortionist Thomas Dillon, 1974.
Hans Frank, 1943.
"The treatment was admin-
"... abortion as treatment for
istered to the children of the
the sexually transmitted disease
of unwanted pregnancy."
Dr. Heinrich Pfannmuller, 1945.
Abortionist Willard Cates.
Reference: Most of these quotes may be found in William Brennan. The
Abortion Holocaust: Today's Final Solution. Order from Landmark
Press, Post Office Box 13547, 1461 Dunn Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63138,
or Life Issues Bookshelf, Sun Life, Thaxton, Virginia 24174, telephone:
(703) 586-4898. 1983, 237 pages.
On Pro-Lifers and Nazis.
The ill-conceived "love of neighbor" has to
disappear, especially in relation to inferior or asocial creatures. It
is the supreme duty of a national state to grant life and livelihood
only to the healthy ... in order to secure the maintenance of a
hereditarily sound and racially pure folk for all eternity. The life of
an individual has meaning only in the light of that ultimate aim, that
is, in the light of his meaning to his family and to his national
Dr. Arthur Guett, Nazi Director of Public Health.
Pro-Lifers = Nazis?
Pro-abortion propagandists love to compare the
pro-life movement to the Nazi movement. They do this for two reasons;
(1) to imply that pro-lifers are 'right-wing fanatics' who attempt to
deprive others of their most fundamental rights (and the most well-known
recent example is the Nazis), and
(2) to attempt to compare themselves to the most pitiful and
well-known victims of recent times; the Jews, who were experimented upon
and slaughtered like cattle, and whose bodies were stacked like cordwood
by the Nazis.
The Specific Allegations. The pro-aborts say that the Nazis banned
abortion, just like the pro-lifers want to do. They say that
"Hitler and his Nazis were anti-choice, too."
This is a catchy slogan, but, unfortunately (for the pro-aborts), it
is entirely untrue.
To begin with, the German Nazi Party bore all of the characteristics
of a left-wing organization. Consider the name of the party:
Nazis, which meant Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei,
or National Socialist German Worker's Party!
Fascism is and always has been a leftist ideology. It is
almost identical to National Socialism (Nazism), whereas international
Socialism is generally referred to as Marxism. Adolf Hitler himself said
on October 7, 1933 that "It is thus necessary that the individual
should finally come to realize that his own ego is of no importance in
comparison with the existence of his nation, that the position of the
individual ego is conditioned solely by the interests of the nation as a
whole." This is a brilliantly concise summary of
"collectivism" (the German term), or 'Socialism' as it is now
Compare this philosophy to our latter-day attitudes, spoken in almost
the same words by world-famous Harvard psychologist B.F. Skinner;
"Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are basic rights. But
they are the rights of the individual and were listed at such a time
when the literatures of freedom and dignity were concerned with the
aggrandizement of the individual. They have only a minor bearing on the
survival of a culture."
The ideologies of Mussolini's Fascists dovetailed very nicely with
Nazism. In both systems, power was centralized, collective labor was
promoted and urged, and unionization was considered one of the highest
goods. Under Hitler's regime, public expenditures ballooned, and social
welfare programs proliferated. One of the primary motivating factors in
the early (pre-invasion) stages of aggressive German foreign policy was
the need for more and more support for these programs. In fact, Hitler
is still admired today by some left-wingers for his extraordinarily
lavish and expensive social programs.
The Nazis progressively exerted a greater and greater degree of
control over the people, and eventually used the fledgling German film
industry to launch an extensive and pervasive propaganda campaign
directed at the people. The primary focus of this campaign: individual
rights and autonomy, the "right to privacy" and the
"freedom of choice" (Auswahlfreiheit) while, at the
same time, these rights were actually being eroded to an unprecedented
The History of the Nazi Abortion Program.
Once in power, the Nazis made "motherhood" into an
official honor and abortion became a symbol of degeneracy.
Revolutionary Communist Party of the United States.
Introduction. When pro-abortionists allege that the Nazis were
"anti-choice," they are mouthing a classic half-truth. Hitler
and his eugenicist physicians banned abortion only for pureblooded
Aryan women (who were a minority within German borders at the time).
Although the Nazis banned abortion for Aryan women, they
enthusiastically peddled and promoted abortion for non-Aryans. In fact,
the Nazis mandated legalized abortion in several European countries for
the first time. They recognized that abortion could be an extremely
effective population control tool.
This is comparable to the current United States practice of
"contraceptive imperialism;" pro-abortionists push very hard
for funding for the United Nations Fund for Population Assistance, which
in turn helps plan and direct the Chinese forced-abortion program. We
also fund the distribution in other countries of abortifacients like
Depo-Provera, which were banned in this country until very recently. And
many of the intra-uterine devices that killed women in the United States
and were subsequently pulled off the domestic market are now being
shipped overseas in great quantities.
It is also interesting to note that pro-abortion American doctors and
medical schools have recently either removed the prohibition against
abortion from the Hippocratic Oath or have disavowed the Oath
altogether. This action, of course, is part of the necessary program of
preparation for medical horrors yet unknown to the public, including
mass euthanasia, experimentation upon newborns, and genetic manipulation
on a mass scale.
The Nazis had to jettison the Oath as well, as described by Dr. Georg
August Weltz, who was responsible for the hideous Nazi "cold
experiments;" "The Hippocratic Oath ... is an honorable
historical document, which, however, does not altogether fit present
times. If it is to be applied today, the wording has to be exchanged
very extensively, and in these reformulations a series of new oaths have
been drawn up which have only a vague relationship to the ancient
Hippocratic Oath ... a [theory of] medicine based on the principle of
nil nocere [first, do no harm] is a very impoverished medicine, and we
are unfortunately not in a position to carry on medicine on that simple
In summary, pro-abortionists calling pro-lifers "Nazis" are
engaging in classic transference; they are labeling their opposition
with the very qualities that they detest in themselves. The mechanisms
and manifestations of the transference tactic are described in Chapter
13 of Volume I.
The following paragraphs trace the history of the German abortion
The Planning Begins.
Nazi physicians, ethicists, and planners had
been greatly influenced by the thinking of American eugenicists, as
described previously in this chapter. The Hegelian (utilitarian)
"ethic" held by the eugenicists deemed that there was such a
thing as human life not worth living. Once this initial assumption had
been made, of course, the definition of "unworthy" inevitably
expanded to suit the needs of those in power at the time.
This type of thinking dovetailed nicely with Hitler's developing
philosophy. In his 1924 book Main Kampf, he wrote that the
government had seven chief responsibilities. One of these was "...
to maintain the practice of modern birth control. No diseased or weak
person should be allowed to have children."
As early as the Summer of 1932, the leaders of the Nazi Party met in
Munich to discuss population policy as it would be applied to non-Aryan
peoples. Demographic and agricultural experts warned that the
"tremendous biological fertility" of the Eastern European
regions must be dealt with by the implementation of a rigidly-enforced
depopulation policy (whose elements remarkably resemble the current
coercive Chinese population program described in Chapter 50).
Hitler, who personally attended at this conference, warned that
"What we have discussed here must remain confidential."
In 1933, the compulsory sterilization law for the mentally
handicapped and crippled when into effect. On October 8, 1935, the Erbgesundheitgesetz
"hereditary health laws" were promulgated. One of these laws
legalized abortion for "just the hard cases" rape, incest, and
if either parent had a hereditary disease that might lead to deformation
of the fetus.
Hitler's Personal Views On Abortion.
Over and over again, pro-abortionists
tell us that Adolf Hitler enacted restrictive laws for "the
protection of motherhood." This is absolutely true but only for Aryan
motherhood. Once again, the pro-abortion liars are only telling a small
portion of the story.
Adolf Hitler, were he living today, would make a superb pro-abortion
propagandist. His views exactly paralleled those of the
modern-day abortionists, who have tried to hard to exterminate the Black
race ever since Margaret Sanger's early birth control programs.
Hitler believed that rights only belong to those strong enough to
defend them just as American pro-abortionists do. He insisted in Mein
Kampf that the weak or small had "no inalienable right to
life" (Lebensrecht) just as American pro-abortionists
do. Those physicians who dared resist Hitler's program of abortion
on demand for women of unfit race were labeled "reactionary"
and "enemies of women" (misogynists) while those who supported
the program were called "sensible" and "friends of
women" the identical words used by American pro-abortionists
The German Blitzkrieg ("lightning
war") swept into Eastern European countries in 1939. The Nazi
eugenicists and population planners were not far behind the tanks.
After the 1939 invasion of Poland, the "Reich Commission for
Strengthening of Germandom" (RKFDV), an SS (Schutzstaffel)
organization, issued the following policy statement on November 25;
"All measures which have the tendency to limit the births are to be
tolerated or to be supported. Abortion in the remaining area of Poland
must be declared free from punishment. The means for abortion and
contraceptive means may be offered publicly without police restriction.
Homosexuality is always to be declared legal. The institutions and
persons involved professionally in abortion practices are not to be
interfered with by police."
Until this time, abortion had been illegal in Poland. The Nazis
introduced "safe and legal abortion" for the first time for
the specific purpose of limiting the future Polish population. It is
absolutely fascinating to note that the key slogan of this program was
"Freedom of Choice!" (Auswahlfreiheit).
The German Ministry of the Interior reviewed and approved of this
program in May 27, 1941, and, on October 19 of the same year, the Polish
population program was put into action. Hitler's July 23 decree,
described below, extended the identical policy of "contraceptives
and abortion on demand" to the other parts of Nazi-occupied Eastern
Eastern European Offensive. In mid-1942, "Operation Blue,"
the German offensive in Eastern Europe, was succeeding brilliantly.
In mid-July of this year, Karl Brandt, Hitler's personal physician,
and Martin Bormann, Hitler's personal secretary, conducted a tour of the
Soviet Ukraine for the purpose of reviewing population demographics.
Bormann subsequently stated to Hitler that "In view of the large
families of the native population, it could only suit us if girls and
women there had as many abortions as possible."
Reichsfuhrer Adolf Hitler strongly agreed with this assessment,
actually incorporating Bormann's language;
The Slavs are to work for us. Insofar as we don't need them
they may die. Therefore compulsory vaccination and education are
superfluous. The fertility of the Slavs is undesirable. They may use
contraceptives or practice abortion the more the better.
In view of the large families of the native population, it
could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as
possible. Active trade in contraceptives ought to be actually encouraged
in the Eastern territories, as we could not possibly have the slightest
interest in increasing the non-Germanic population.
On July 22, Brandt and Bormann proposed a restrictive population
policy to Hitler, and on the very next day, the Fuhrer approved it. The
resulting eight-paragraph secret order was, as one historian stated,
"... perhaps the most extreme policy statement ever issued from the
The population control policy included a paragraph that paraphrased
Hitler's wording; "When girls and women in the Occupied Territories
of the East have abortions, we can only be in favor of it; in any case
we should not oppose it. The Fuhrer believes that we should authorize
the development of a thriving trade in contraceptives. We are not
interested in seeing the non-German population multiply."
The Whole Package.
A short April 27, 1942 statement by Berlin
population and demographics expert Professor Heinrich Wetzel (reproduced
below in its entirety) summarized the entire Nazi population control
program regardless of location. Notice carefully the striking
similarities this program has to the one that has been implemented in
the United States by pro-abortion groups.
Every propaganda means, especially the press, radio and movies,
as well as pamphlets, booklets, and lectures, must be used to instill in
the Russian population the idea that it is harmful to have several
children. We must emphasize the expenses that children cause, the good
things that people could have had with the money spent on them. We could
also hint at the dangerous effect of childbearing on a woman's health.
Paralleling such propaganda, a large-scale campaign would be
launched in favor of contraceptive devices. A contraceptive industry
must be established. Neither the circulation and sale of contraceptives
nor abortions must be prosecuted.
It will even be necessary to open special institutions for
abortion, and to train midwives and nurses for this purpose. The
population will practice abortion all the more willingly if these
institutions are competently operated. The doctors must be able to help
out, in case there is any question of this being a breach of their
professional ethics. Voluntary sterilization must also be recommended by
By this time, the Nazis recognized that personal and professional
consciences were often deeply troubled by the practice of widespread and
easily-available abortion. Heinrich Himmler soothed these troubled
consciences by issuing a decree in March of 1943 that is remarkable
similar to those promulgated by our own American Medical Association;
"The Russian physicians or the Russian Medical Association, which
must not be informed of this order, are to be told in individual cases
that the pregnancy is being interrupted for reasons of social
The Aftermath of Murder.
After the war, the Nuremberg Trials brought
most of the Nazi war criminals involved in Germany's population control
programs to justice. Between October of 1947 and March of 1948, the
United States Military Tribunal prosecuted the leadership of the RKFDV
in its 'Case 8.' One of the charges was that "Protection of the law
was denied to the unborn children of the Russian and Polish women in
Nazi Germany. Abortions were encouraged and even forced on these
One of the RKFDV documents entered into evidence by the U.S.
prosecution stated that "It is known that racially inferior
offspring of Eastern workers and Poles is to be avoided if at all
possible. Although pregnancy interruptions ought to be carried out on a
voluntary basis only, pressure is to be applied in each of these
The Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal indicted and convicted ten Nazi
leaders for "encouraging and compelling abortions," an act
which the Tribunal characterized as "a crime against
As with their other crimes against humanity, the Nazis protested that
"we were just following orders." Lieutenant General Richard
Hildebrandt, the SS (Schutzstaffel) Chief of the RKFVD's Race and
Settlement Office in Berlin, stated that "Up to now nobody had the
idea to see in this interruption of pregnancy a crime against
He was given a 25-year sentence.
Other officers of the RKFVD were meted sentences ranging from ten
years for Fritz Schwalm, a "Racial Examination Officer," to
life imprisonment for Ulrich Griefelt, the organization's Chief
Other evidence submitted into evidence included a July 13, 1943
German military report referring to "an intensification of
countermeasures" against Ukrainians, including the "forcible
abortion of pregnant women." Other women within the borders of
Germany itself were forcibly aborted as punishment for attempting to
avoid forced labor in German factories.
When our "Nuremberg Trials" are held for United States
abortionists and euthanasiasts, exactly the same excuses will be given
by those who have committed latter-day crimes against preborn humanity.
The Genocide Treaty.
With the atrocities of Nazism still fresh in the
minds of the world, international lawyers soon drafted the
"Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of
Genocide," which defines genocide as "acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical (ethnic),
racial, or religious group."
Article II further defines genocide as "imposing measures
intended to prevent births within the group."
References: Abortion/Holocaust Analogy.
Any excuse will serve a tyrant.
 Penny Lea. "Sing a Little Louder!" I Believe in Life,
Post Office Box 34077, Pensacola, Florida 32507, telephone: (904)
 'Masturbation guru' Sol Gordon. Personal Issues in Human
Sexuality, page 65.
 C.S. Lewis. The Screwtape Letters. New York: Macmillan,
1964. Page ix.
 "Abortion and the Holocaust: Twisting the Language."
'Religious' Coalition for Abortion Rights, 100 Maryland Avenue NE,
Washington, DC 20002, telephone: (202) 543-7032. 1987, 24 pages. This
booklet is stylishly written and laid out on only the best paper. It
features five short essays by apostate 'Jews' and phony 'Christians'
that are masterpieces of Doublethink and propaganda. This booklet is
mandatory reading for any pro-lifer who wants insight into just how
clever pro-abort propaganda can be.
 Regina Barshak. "A Jewish Cry of Protest." Letter in The
Boston Globe, March 18, 1972. Also distributed by the National
Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) for propaganda purposes on page 44
of their looseleaf booklet entitled "Organizing for Action."
Prepared by Vicki Z. Kaplan for the National Abortion Rights Action
League, 250 West 57th Street, New York, N.Y. 10019. 51 pages, no date.
 Robert Martin, M.D. Spiritual Semites: Catholics and Jews
During World War Two. The Catholic League for Religious and Civil
Rights, 1100 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233. 1983, 59
pages. A fine summary of the activities that Pope Pius XII engaged in
during World War II in his efforts to save thousands of Jews.
 Professor Oscar Halceki. Eugenio Pacelli: Pope of Peace.
1951, Farrar, Straus and Young, Inc. Pages 192 to 197. Also see Alden
Hatch and Seamus Walshe. Crown of Glory: The Life of Pope Pius XII.
New York: Hawthorne Books, Inc., 1957, pages 168 and 169.
 Father Robert A. Graham, S.J. "Pius XII: Years of Praise,
Years of Blame." Supplement to the Newsletter of the Catholic
League for Religious and Civil Rights, December 1989. Also see Father
Vincent A. Lapomarda. "Some Reflections on Catholics and the
Holocaust." Supplement to the Catholic League Newsletter of
February 1987. Both are available as reprints from the Catholic League,
1100 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233.
 Father Arthur J. Klyber. "The Chief Rabbi's
Conversion." This Rock, April 1992, pages 18 to 21.
 Dr. Leo Alexander. "Medical Science Under
Dictatorship." The New England Journal of Medicine, July 14,
1949, pages 39 to 47. This superbly-written summary of the medical
horrors inflicted by Nazi 'doctors' on their victims is available as
Reprint #605 from the Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences
(The Hastings Institute), Hastings-on-Hudson, New York, 10706.
 Charles J. Sykes. "Medical Nightmares: German Doctors/
American Doctors." Milwaukee: Catholic League for Religious and
Civil Rights, 1987, page 14.
 William Gaylin and Marc Laape (president and associate for
biological sciences at the Hastings Institute). "Fetal Politics:
The Debate on Experimenting with the Unborn." Atlantic Monthly,
 William Brennan. The Abortion Holocaust: Today's Final Solution.
1983, 237 pages.
 Rudolf Hess, quoted in Robert Lipton's The Nazi Doctors
(New York: Basic Books), pages 23 and 129.
 Allen Chase. The Legacy of Malthus: The Social Costs of the
New Scientific Racism (Chicago: University of Illinois Press), pages
69 and 316. Also New York: Knopf, 1976, page 349.
 Lothrop Stoddard, Ph.D. The Rising Tide of Color Against
White World-Supremacy. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1921.
Reprinted in 1971 by Negro Universities Press, Westport, Connecticut.
Pages i, 8, 9, 90, 231, 298, 301, 302, 308, and 309 in the reprinted
 H.L. Mencken. "Utopia by Sterilization." The
American Mercury, August 1937.
 Robert N. Proctor. Racial Hygiene (Massachusetts: Harvard
University Press), page 103.
 United States Supreme Court decision Buck v. Bell, 274 US
200 (1927), at 207.
 Frederick Osborne of the American Museum of Natural History, in
his 1940 book Preface to Eugenics (New York: Harper and Row),
 H.G. Whittington, M.D. "Role of the Counselor in
Abortion." Sarah Lewit (Editor). Abortion Techniques and
Services: Proceedings of the Conference, New York, N.Y., June 3-5, 1971.
Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1972.
 W.N. Long, M.D., B.R. Brandshaw, Ph.D., and M. Burge.
"Black Attitudes Regarding Contraception, Abortion, and
Sterilization." Sarah Lewit (Editor). Abortion Techniques and
Services: Proceedings of the Conference, New York, N.Y., June 3-5, 1971.
Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1972.
 James Tunstead Burtchaell. "The Holocaust and
Abortion." Supplement to the newsletter of the Catholic League for
Religious and Civil Rights, Volume 9, Number 11.
 L. Dawidowicz. The War Against the Jews. New York: Holt,
Rinehart, Winston, 1975.
 Christopher Browning. Ordinary Men. Harper-Collins
Publishing, 1992. Reviewed in the April 12, 1992 New York Times Book
Review by psychiatrist Walter Reich.
 "Abortion Clinic Staff Worker Gives Her Excuses." Life
Advocate (publication of Advocates for Life Ministries, Portland,
Oregon), April 1992, page 21.
 Dora Greenwald, MSW, and John Szenes, M.D., quoted by Magda
Denes. "Performing Abortions." Commentary, October
1976, pages 33 to 37. A truly frightening and profoundly sickening
article by a doctor who observes and describes in graphic detail a
number of saline abortions and their results. She acknowledges that
abortion is killing, but a type of "necessary" killing.
 Warren Hern, M.D. Abortion Practice. 1984, J.B.
Lippincott Company, pages 154, 323, and 325. Also from Hern's address of
the Association of Planned Parenthood Physicians at their 1978
convention in San Diego. Presentation entitled "WHAT ABOUT US?
Staff Reactions to the D&E Procedure." Quoted in The
Advocate (publication of Advocates for Life Ministries, Portland,
Oregon), March 1986, page 15.
 British abortionist describing a new late-term abortion
procedure. Quoted in HLI Reports, June 1986, and in "Just
Another Piece of Meat?" ALL About Issues, August-September
1986, pages 51 and 52. The umbilical cord is cut on the first day, and,
after the preborn baby dies and begins to decay, the abortionist pulls
 Pam Crosby, Clinical Coordinator at Prince George's Reproductive
Health Services, on the clinic dumping second-trimester babies in their
trash. Quoted in Debra Braun. "Bodies of Aborted Babies Thrown in
Trash at Maryland Clinic." National Right to Life News,
December 8, 1983, page 5.
 Adolf Hitler. Mein Kampf. Written in 1925 and released by
Trans Ralph Manheim Publishers, Boston, 1943, pages 257 and 404 and 405.
Also released by Houghton, Mifflin of New York in 1971, pages 214 and
 For examples of such dehumanizing language, see the following
works. Simon Clough. A Candid Appeal to the Citizens of the United
States, Proving that the Doctrines Advanced and the Measures Pursued by
the Abolitionists Relative to the Subject of Emancipation, are
Inconsistent with the Teachings and Directions of the Bible and that
those Clergymen Engaged in the Dissemination of these Principles Should
be Immediately Dismissed by their Respective Congregations as False
Teachers. New York, 1834. Also: Richard H. Colfax. Evidence
Against the Views of the Abolitionists, Consisting of Physical and Moral
Proofs, of the Natural Inferiority of the Negroes. New York, 1833.
Also: W.P.N. Fitzgerald. A Scriptural View of Slavery and Abolition.
New Haven, 1839. Also: R. Yearson. The Amenability of Northern
Incendiaries ... Charleston, 1835, page 5. Also: James G. Birney. The
American Churches: The Bulwarks of American Slavery. London, 1840,
pages 15 to 18.
 Dr. Arthur Guett, Nazi Director of Public Health. Quoted by
Andrew C. Ivy, M.D. "Abortion and the Medical Profession." Human
Life Review, Summer 1984, page 80.
 H.W. Koch. Hitler Youth: The Duped Generation. New York:
Ballantine Books, 1972. Page 10.
 Harvard psychologist B.F. Skinner. Beyond Freedom and Dignity.
New York: Knopf, 1971. Page 180.
 "Women Are Not Incubators!: The Assault on Abortion
Rights." Revolutionary Communist Party of the United States, Revolutionary
Worker, November 6, 1989. Also distributed as a special reprint
booklet, page 17.
 Dr. Georg August Weltz, who was responsible for the Nazi
"cold experiments." Quoted in The United States v. Brandt,
et al. The Medical Cases, American Military Tribunal, Nuremberg.
Wille in direct examination of Weltz, May 7, 1947, pages 7,131-7,134.
Also quoted in Herbert Ratner, M.D. "The Slide Toward
"Mercy-Killing."" Child and Family Reprint Booklet
Series, 1987, page v.
 Hermann Rauschning. The Voice of Destruction. New York,
1941, pages 34-38. Also: Joseph B. Schechtman. European Population
Transfers, 1936-45. New York, 1946, pages 266 and 296.
 Gitta Sereny. Into That Darkness. New York, 1974, page
 Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military
Tribunals. Washington, 1949-1954. Transcript at IV: 1,081 to 1,084.
 Ihor Kamenetsky. Secret Nazi Plans for Eastern Europe.
New York: 1961, chapter on "German Lebensraum," page
 Paul Hilberg. The Destruction of European Jews. Chicago,
1961, page 642. Also: Nuremberg trial transcripts at NG-844. Also:
Alexander Dallin. German Rule in Russia, 1941 to 1945. London:
Winchester Books, 1957, page 457.
 Dallin, page 141. Also see Kamenetsky, page 143.
 Adolf Hitler, quoted in (1) William Shirer. The Rise and Fall
of the Third Reich. London: Pan Books, 1964. Page 1,118. Source
document: Nuremburg #1130-PS, "Nazi Conspiracy and
Aggression," Volume VIII, page 53. (2) Hillel and Henry. Of Pure
Blood. Page 148, quoting Hitler's "Tigesprache im
 Dallin, page 141.
 Leon Poliakov. Harvest of Hate. Syracuse, New York, 1954,
pages 272-274. Also see Kamenetsky, pages 197-199.
 Poliakov, pages 272-274. Also: Nuremberg trial transcripts at NG-2325.
 Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military
Tribunals. Washington, 1949-1954. Transcript at V:109. Also: Richard
Stites. The Women's Liberation Movement in Russia. Princeton,
1975, pages 264 to 265, 355, 385 to 388, and 403 to 405.
 Nuremberg Trial Transcripts at IV: 1,077, V: 112; and IV: 1,076,
1,081, and 1,090.
 Michael Schwartz. "Abortion: The Nazi Connection."
Newsletter of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, August
1978. Page 1.
 William Manchester. The Arms of Krupp. New York, 1964,
 Dallin, pages 435 and 458.
 Nehemiah Robinson. The Genocide Convention: A Commentary.
New York, 1960, page 57. Also see Leo Kuper. The Prevention of
Genocide. New Haven, 1985, page 241f.
Further Reading: The Abortion/Holocaust Analogy.
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. "Rescuers of Jews During
the Holocaust: Programs and Resources."
Jewish Foundation for
Christian Rescuers, a project of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai
B'rith. 823 United Nations Plaza, New York, New York 10017, telephone:
(212) 490-2525. A 16-page catalog of books, films, and other information
on how Christians protected and rescued Jews during World War II.
Robert Bluford and Robert E. Petres. Unwanted Pregnancy.
York: Harper and Row, 1973. A frightening book that advocates the
elimination of the unwanted and undesirable, precisely as Binding and
Hoche did more than a half-century ago as they laid the foundation for
the Nazi mentality and the resulting Holocaust.
William Brennan. The Abortion Holocaust: Today's Final Solution.
1983, 237 pages. Order from Landmark Press, Post Office Box 13547, 1461
Dunn Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63138, or Life Issues Bookshelf, Sun
Life, Thaxton, Virginia 24174, telephone: (703) 586-4898, or American
Life Lobby, Post Office Box 490, Stafford, Virginia 22554. Reviewed by
David H. Andrusko on page 6 of the March 10, 1983 issue of National
Right to Life News and on page 34 of the April 1984 ALL About
Issues. This book is an incredibly detailed presentation of the
hundreds of parallels between the Nazi holocaust of World War II and the
one going on in the United States right now. Traces the development of
the holocausts from years before they 'went public' to their final
horrible configurations. The best available documentation of the more
than 225 intimate parallels between the original Holocaust and the one
now being perpetrated in our country. A 'must read' for pure interest
and fascinating facts.
Father James Tunstead Burtchaell. Rachel Weeping: The Case Against
New York: Harper & Row, 1982. 381 pages. Five essays,
marked with crystal-clear reasoning and fully documented, addressing
several major arguments against abortion, including the Holocaust
analogy, the slavery analogy, and point-by-point rebuttals of
pro-abortion slogans. Of particular interest is the first essay, which
uses pro-abortion sources to show how damaging abortion is to
Catholics United for Life. "Holocaust: New and Old."
14-page booklet containing the complete interview by National
Catholic Register editor Patrick Riley of Elasah Drogin of the group
Remnant of Israel. The subject of the interview was parallels between
the Nazi Holocaust and the one now happening in the United States, and
the willing complicity of cultural Jews in the slaughter. This booklet
is available from Catholics United for Life, New Hope, Kentucky 40052.
Martin Chervin. Born Unborn.
Order from Theater Without Walls,
Post Office Box 661236, Los Angeles, California 90066. A dramatic
description of the horrors of abortion from the points of view of the
baby, the mother, and society.
Eugene F. Diamond, M.D. This Curette for Hire.
Life Issues Bookshelf, Sun Life, Thaxton, Virginia 24174, telephone:
(703) 586-4898. The author discusses the deterioration of medical ethics
and the critical role of the doctor in all anti-life activities:
abortion, fetal experimentation, sterilization, euthanasia, infanticide,
sex therapy, and more.
Elasah Drogin. "Holocaust: New and Old."
A 14-page booklet
containing the complete interview by National Catholic Register
editor Patrick Riley of Elasah Drogin of the group Remnant of Israel.
The subject of the interview was parallels between the Nazi Holocaust
and the one now happening in the United States, and the willing
complicity of cultural Jews in the slaughter. This booklet is available
from Catholics United for Life, New Hope, Kentucky 40052.
Hugh Gregory Gallagher. By Trust Betrayed: Patients, Physicians,
and the License to Kill in the Third Reich.
Henry Holt and Company,
115 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011. 1990, 335 pages. The
details on Nazi Germany's "Aktion T-4" program and the
disturbing parallels to today's treatment of the weak and disabled.
Michael H. Kater. Doctors Under Hitler.
University of North
Carolina Press, 1989. As its name implies, this book is a detailed
examination of the role played by doctors as they slowly introduced the
genocidal practices of the medical profession to the Nazi movement.
Robert Jay Lifton. The Nazi Doctors.
Basic Books, 1986. 561
pages. Reviewed by Eugene F. Diamond, M.D., on pages 5 and 15 of the
August 13, 1987 issue of National Right to Life News. This
excellent book describes in great detail how the original Holocaust was
begun by the medical profession. It also warns about how such an event
could happen in our country. The book provides invaluable and detailed
information on the psychology and history of the Nazi biomedical
Holocaust. Special treatment is given to the sterilization programs, the
role of the doctors, and a detailed description of the Holocaust
operating at the Auschwitz death camp.
Robert Martin, M.D. Spiritual Semites: Catholics and Jews During
World War Two.
The Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights,
1100 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233. 1983, 59 pages. A
fine summary of the activities that Pope Pius XII engaged in during
World War II in his efforts to save thousands of Jews.
Lothrop Stoddard, Ph.D. The Rising Tide of Color Against White
New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1921. Reprinted
in 1971 by Negro Universities Press, Westport, Connecticut. A classic
racist book that clearly and vividly demonstrates the kind of thinking
that led to eugenics, the current-day racist abortion program in the
United States, and the Nazi mentality.
Fredric Wertham, M.D. A Sign for Cain: An Exploration of Human
Macmillan Company, 866 Third Avenue, New York, New York
10022. 1973, 375 pages. Although it does not directly address abortion,
this excellent book explores the roots, motivations, and expressions of
human violence against other humans. Additionally, Dr. Wertham looks at
the mechanics of violence in all of its forms. Abortion and euthanasia
fit nicely into this picture.
Wolf Wolfenberger. The New Genocide of Handicapped and Afflicted
Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Training Institute.
1987, 114 pages. Reviewed by Julie Grimstad on page 46 of the May 1990 ALL
About Issues. This little volume deals with the progressive
expansion of "deathmaking" and its ties to the anti-life
© American Life League BBS — 1-703-659-7111
This is a chapter of the Pro-Life Activist's Encyclopedia Published
by American Life League.